Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

B402, Where and how in there did you see Iran lie? They have not denied their enrichment. One statement no one has disproved yet is Iran's saying they were not developing a nuclear weapon. That if they had been interested in that they would have done it before now.

All of your,

"Looks like Iran lied....If by chance we've avoided a Nagasaki or Hiroshima by taking action it was well worth it......If they do explode a nuke, it wasn't from lack of trying and being taken the fool negotiating with a country who lied about enrichment only needed in nukes......
Regardless of the president"

looks like self-serving mindless speculative dribble to me.

If your supposed lie is about Iran being a "threshold nation" then that of yours is invalid since reliance on that as a justification for the attacks, by simple logic, would necessitate attacks on other threshold nations:

AI Overview

The countries listed – Japan, Germany, Brazil, Canada, and South Korea – are often considered "nuclear threshold states". This means they possess the technical capability and resources to develop nuclear weapons but have chosen not to, maintaining a non-nuclear status. These nations have the scientific knowledge, materials, and infrastructure to quickly produce nuclear weapons if they decided to do so, making them threshold states.

Here's a more detailed look at each:

Japan:
Japan is often cited as having the fastest potential to build nuclear weapons due to its advanced technology and abundant plutonium.

Germany:
Germany, with its strong industrial base and nuclear energy program, could quickly develop nuclear weapons if it chose to.

Brazil:
Brazil has a history of nuclear research and has the technical capacity to develop nuclear weapons, but has chosen not to.

Canada:
Canada has the technological know-how and raw materials to produce nuclear weapons.

South Korea:
South Korea has also been identified as a nuclear threshold state, having previously engaged in nuclear weapons research.

These countries, while capable of developing nuclear weapons, are part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and have committed to peaceful uses of nuclear technology

https://www.google.com/search?q=threshold+nations+japan+germany+brazil+canada+s+korea...&client=firefox-b-d&sca_esv=4606b3d8337ea9a9&sxsrf=AE3TifNiz8OEjAldceIhqBgJMCnXmZT6Pw%3A1750726512808&ei=cPdZaLOTMea94-EP4rOnqQU&ved=0ahUKEwizi5S_7IiOAxXm3jgGHeLZKVUQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=threshold+nations+japan+germany+brazil+canada+s+korea...&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiOHRocmVzaG9sZCBuYXRpb25zIGphcGFuIGdlcm1hbnkgYnJhemlsIGNhbmFkYSBzIGtvcmVhLi4uMggQABiABBiiBDIFEAAY7wUyBRAAGO8FMgUQABjvBTIFEAAY7wVIrixQkAdYmChwA3gBkAEAmAHoAaAB2g6qAQUwLjguMrgBA8gBAPgBAZgCC6ACywzCAgoQABiwAxjWBBhHwgIKECEYoAEYwwQYCpgDAIgGAZAGCJIHBTMuNi4yoAePJ7IHBTAuNi4yuAepDMIHBzAuMS44LjLIBzs&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

As, of course, is Iran. But why would they remain in the NNPT now?

How much racism (or bigotry) could be seen in Iran being singled out where other so-called threshold countries have not been. Or is it more just you gotta have a enemy, right?

Further unmitigated apologist dribble by you. In your "If by chance"

All that said, there is an "if by chance" neither you nor any other
of your fellow Trump apologists have had a word to say on:

Israel’s strikes might accelerate Iran’s race towards nuclear weapons
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176346211