Affluence Corp (AFFUD)

[RichieBoy]

Wanting yes, trying* on this exchange means engaging shareholders. The last time you saw AFFU engaging shareholders was last year. December 23rd around 2pm to be precise. That lack of communication directly effects credibility.

That works out to 4 PRs per year on average. Not sure about you. To me that's like AFFU was clandestinely entered in the National Paint Drying Championships as a favourite wild card. I asked AI "on a scale of 1-10 how would you score Affluence Corporation on credibility? " NB* I asked that question as non-biased as possible and yes I agree with AI's findings. The point here, it's not just me that sees AFFU's efforts to promote in this light.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Based on the available information, Affluence Corporation's credibility appears to be questionable.

Key factors include:

Non-cooperation with ratings agencies: Both Affluence Commodities Private Limited and Affluence Shares and Stocks Private Limited have been classified under the "issuer not cooperating" category by CARE Ratings due to failure to provide sufficient information for monitoring their ratings.

Lack of transparency: Concerns about transparency and unresolved issues, such as reliance on a prohibited auditing service provider, raise red flags.

Stock performance concerns: The stock has shown weak performance, with negative forecasts and low trading volumes, adding to doubts about its stability.

On a scale of 1 to 10, Affluence Corporation's credibility would likely score around 3, reflecting significant concerns but not complete unreliability.

Let me repeat that so the shock doesn't blow over anyone's head. On a scale of 1 to 10, Affluence Corporation's credibility would likely score around 3, reflecting significant concerns but not complete unreliability.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


At the end of the day this is not a micro Berthshire Hathaway after all. I regret saying that. There's credibility issues on AFFU's credibility 1jas. The only sure fired resolution to that handicap is more transparency. More effort keeping shareholders informed. One obvious way to do that is to organize an AGM which retail shareholders/lurkers/whales and would-be like minded individuals can participate in. More communiques from THE OWNERS.

Don't forget around 20 MTi employees will want what we want also. This is a tough* exchange. Many fly by nights fly away. Yes I know AFFU wants to be taken seriously by the market and the industry. But are they doing that? Are they making it easier on themselves in being more transparent? In actual fact they're making this harder on themselves. With perpetual marbles in their mouth filings and PRs coupled with outright stonewalling of investors. It does seem high time they AT LEAST hire a promotion agency.

Timothy Sykes might do the trick because he is intimately familiar with what's needed down here on the Pinks. You bet I'm serious on Tim, at least in the interim. We probably can't afford a high profile Tech-head CEO yet. But Tim knows intricately how to communicate companies with shareholders. Communication is the canary in the coal mine on Pinks. Without it we're a dead duck.

No I have no connections with Timothy Sykes. I just know we are in deep doo-doo if we don't bring our A-game boosting TRANSPARENT market communication which significantly raises market CONFIDENCE and good optics which are extremely important to AFFU right now.