Spy on people??....I read what you write. Isn't this the reason you've made all those silly posts of yours?
So, in this case, we have two different style posters....
Poster A has lost money in the one stock they post about for years. Doesn't accept the company hasn't existed for years. Posts information about OTHER companies progress AND think they have the right to decide who is allowed to read the posts on a public website.
Poster B HAS NOT lost money in this stock. Recognizes this company no longer exists or trades. And spends some of their time (for free) to warn others about the dangers and pitfalls of what to look out for, so they don't make the same mistakes.
Which one of these posters should others be listening to?
Only one of us has lost all their money here and "invested" poorly. Why you think this gives you the right to advise others is beyond me. Unless you are issuing a warning to not make the mistakes you have, your posts are a detriment. I think its perfectly logical to ask you what your credentials are for advising us.
Just my opinion, of course.