B402, By "you people" i assume you mean all of the women athletes who don't mind, and all the sports administrators and coaches et al who are managing the inclusion where it is permitted. Personally, i would say in cases as, on the face of it, that one where unfair advantage is a given the trans people should not be allowed to compete against cis females. If that could be managed. There are so few trans athletes involved i don't see why cases couldn't be looked at individually. That said there are laws on the books too:
At the White House meeting, Trump called out for Mills and asked if she was “not going to comply” with his executive order. The Maine governor replied that she would “comply with state and federal laws,” to which Trump said, “We are the federal law.” He followed by threatening to withhold federal funding from her state.
“We’re going to follow the law, sir. We’ll see you in court,” Mills said.
Later that day, the civil rights office for the U.S. Education Department, as well as its HHS counterpart, announced an investigation into Maine’s educational agency. The U.S. Agriculture Department said the next day that it was initiating a compliance review of the University of Maine following what it described as that state’s “blatant disregard” for Trump’s executive order.
You ignorantly toss around generalization lazily. Personally my general feeling on the wider issue is that i'm happy to see so many managing the inclusion principle so well. So warmly.
You people unjustly accused the Biden administration of weaponizing agencies where they didn't. Trump's administration will weaponize where it hasn't happened before.
The narrow little bigoted cell you put yourselves in would be too cold a place to be.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”