News Focus
News Focus
Followers 107
Posts 14399
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/23/2004

Re: JamesLH post# 82848

Thursday, 03/06/2025 10:29:13 AM

Thursday, March 06, 2025 10:29:13 AM

Post# of 83827
James you hit the nail on the head." every file and complaint has the REAL victim's details". and hence the problem I have.

You made the following post.

- me and my attorney contacted Moss (wouldn't Moss have REAL victim's details if you used Real victim details)

- me an my attorney contracted Foxess china headquarters (wouldn't FoxEss china have REAL victim's details if used Real victim details)

- I contacted Kenny Whatley of Nal Tolcor (wouldn't Whatley have Real victim details if you used Real victim details)

- I contacted GEP new energy, I contacted Italy, I contacted FoxEss USA (wouldn't they all have real victim details if you used real victim details)

So you don't get confused the following is not an attack of your credibility but simply a question regarding clarification of what you posted.

If Moss and FoXEss China had not only your Real victim details but also the contact information information of YOUR REAL ATTORNEY, and the others you contacted also have your Real Victim details and Campanella had a working relationship with all of them.

Then why would Campanella have the need to subpoena public message boards to get your information when he could have subpoena you directly via your attorney whose information he could obtain though Moss of FoxEss if your attorney information was given to them?


Hence my problem.

PS
James if you believe me giving my honest opinions on your post as an an attack on you don't address your post to me and you wouldn't have to read them.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y