hap..., Your dishonest fiddling doesn't fly here .. we don't need no crime here, not under the law here we don't have to designate a specific crime.... only the intent, for this little step . .. this is the law... and in spite of that we did specify the crime ...
Myth: The prosecution didn’t tell Trump what he was charged with until closing argument, a violation of due process.
Response: While the indictment specified each of the checks, invoices, and ledger entries alleged to have been falsified, it did not specify which crime Trump allegedly concealed. A defendant is entitled to fair notice of the crime with which he is charged so that he can effectively defend himself at trial, but New York law does not require this level of specificity in the charging document. New York case law requires that the indictment allege only a general intent to conceal a crime, not an intent to conceal a specific crime.
Nonetheless, prosecutors provided this specificity in a prosecution filing in November 2023, five months before his trial began. In that filing, prosecutors disclosed that the crimes they alleged Trump intended to conceal were violating state and federal campaign finance laws and violating state tax laws. The court rejected an additional basis offered by the prosecution, falsifying business records outside the Trump organization.
and he did -- judge to jury -- "we don't need no crime here -- we only need to know that that trump guy intended to commit a crime'" Beria/Russia would be proud
Yeah, proud of you. Am wondering now, have you ever here been man enough to admit you are wrong? Or are you one of the Cohn-Trump clan too.