I am not going back to look at your posts, but I didn't think much of yesterday's trading. I was asking about who has been buying for almost 2 years. You might not have understood, but I have asked this same question for about 6 months.
If you are suggesting that an OTC company that diluted 30 billion in shares, was able to eliminate $58mil in toxic debt because retail bought up the debt and maintained the share price - give or take, you are a conspiracy theorist. That is not realistic at all. If so, retail will bring this stock to $1000 over the course of the next 3 months now that the debt is gone. Can't wait.
It is more realistic that 4 major players have been buying up the stock. It is even more realistic that someone shorted this stock in a big way thinking they could bankrupt the company and when the price was maintained, they doubled down (hundreds of times). In fact, that explanation is very realistic because it sems to explain how the company managed to eliminate $58mil in toxic debt in a year and a half.
I personally would rather discuss how 3 or four players got together to use their individual expertise to potentially create a cradle to grave commodity handling situation, but maybe someone should look into potential illegal activities at HMBL. Not likely done by me, but sure would explain the relentless pursuit of failure around a message board. Did I hit too close to home suggesting handlers?
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
