You simply do not understand the meaning of words. The data support my argument and you still have not provided any source to back up what you clearly pulled out of your ass. You MUST be scared to death to do your own search, knowing it will NOT contradict what I've posted.
If I'm wrong then every point made below in favor of the Dems would be flipped on its head and the lead sentence would read.....
Based on the search results, the Republican Party has historically shown stronger economic performance when in control of the presidency:
But it doesn't read that way. Why? Occam's Razor here; because the reality is as posted below. Game, set and match on this issue.
How many times do we have to go through this exercise? It's not even a close call. Google/AI it however you choose but don't bothsides this question ever again and post without evidence that contradicts the following.
Note, back to 1940f'ing5 for corporate earnings/share. WTF is up with THAT, from socialists no less?
Based on the search results, the Democratic Party has historically shown stronger economic performance when in control of the presidency:
GDP Growth: Annual real GDP growth is 1.2 percentage points faster during Democratic administrations (3.79%) compared to Republican ones (2.60%)
Job Creation: Total job growth averages 2.5% annually during Democratic administrations, compared to just over 1% during Republican administrations.
Stock Market Performance: The S&P 500 has shown higher annual returns under Democratic presidents (8.35%) compared to Republican presidents (2.70%)
Corporate Profits: Corporate earnings per share grew 12.8% on average under Democratic presidents versus 1.8% for Republicans since 1945.
Recession Frequency: Ten of the eleven U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
