I thought the authors said exactly "It's honest taxpayers against the obscenely rich non tax payers" that, here:
It is beyond time for Congress to put the interests of honest taxpayers ahead of dishonest ones. Congress should reject the House legislation’s cuts to IRS base funding and its gutting of the Inflation Reduction Act’s mandatory IRS funds. The Senate’s bipartisan approach should set the bare minimum for IRS base funding and the maximum for rescinding mandatory IRS funding.
Meanwhile, the IRS should make no changes as it continues to implement its strategic plan, by: hiring the staff necessary to answer the phones so tax filers can get their questions answered; creating new customer service tools; modernizing outdated computer systems;and hiring the auditors needed to review complex tax returns and collect taxes from wealthy households trying to cheat.[10] The effect of the $21 billion cut from the debt limit agreement would come later in the decade: the IRA’s $80 billion was intended to last for ten years, so the cut would accelerate the IRS’s existing funding cliff (that is, when the mandatory is scheduled to expire) by roughly two years.