Why do you still care about Pawson??? There is a new receiver and a new CEO totally unrelated to Pawson The only lawsuit that seems to be still in play is the Nano Filter Inc one (They could have settled by now, though) Then of course the over 10m$ owe to Brett, but that's totally different. No idea how OPTI will repay him, at the moment it doesn't matter. He has all the incentive to make it work. Ain't no way he gets any cash if OPTI doesn't exit EM and don't find at least a somewhat decent merger. Now, if you are wondering why a decent company would choose to merger with OPTI... That's a totally different story... I see very significant liquidity as a "pro", besides that, I don't really see why they would, but I'm not them. Note of Receiver Bond just appeared on the Court Docket Didn't buy it, but this one should be similar https://trellis.law/doc/196261627/notice-filed-notice-filing-receiver-s-oath-bond It's just to "officially" states that the Plaintiff (In this case Brett) received the Receiver Oath and saw proof of the Bond