Oh....I didn't think it was bad....just had some bull shite' in it. I'll find the nutso piece and try to post it. Here is some nonsense that shouldn't have been printed as an opinion:
Start with Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans in 2021. They could — and should — have voted to convict Trump after his second impeachment, which would have prevented him from running again for the presidency. Instead, McConnell and almost every other GOP senator let him off the hook.
Yeah.....that never would have happened given the fact that most see all of this as a political judicial attack, so don't think for a second that those cats were going to think differently.
Last but most certainly not least: The Republican appointees on the Supreme Court bailed Trump out this year — in the heart of the general election campaign and when it mattered most.
That is a complete false. Further:
They first slow-walked Trump’s appeal on immunity grounds this year and then created a new doctrine of criminal immunity for Trump that had no real basis in the law
That is utter nonsense. The Department of Justice has held that stance forever...and the Supreme Court was then forced to decide ..and they did:
This is just an Author's opinion.....but just so incorrect:
Garland is a serious, well-intentioned and complex figure. But given all this, he may go down as one of the worst and most broadly unpopular attorney generals in American history — hated by the anti-Trump part of the country for failing to bring Trump to justice, and hated by the pro-Trump part of the country for pursuing Trump at all. I sincerely hope he provides a first-hand accounting of what happened after he too leaves office next year.
But that is not really the article I should have posted. I couldn't find the nutjob one so used that...lol. I'll find it and post it shortly.