Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,817.57
(
0.01%
)
US TECH 100
24,470.00
(
0.11%
)
Dow Jones
47,658.38
(
-0.54%
)
Brent Oil
98.50
(
-1.36%
)
Bitcoin
71,903.50
(
1.60%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 129746
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

gitreal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 204
Posts 46259
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 03/21/2012

gitreal

Member Level

Re: JohnnyRotton post# 116374

Friday, 10/04/2024 1:57:02 PM

Friday, October 04, 2024 1:57:02 PM

Post# of 129746
The problem is how you define "richest". There are many, many mines where individual assays were many times higher than 2.44 oz/ton. I have personally collected assay samples that ran over 1,000 oz/ton gold - pretty stuff.

If "richest" means the most oz produced, the Ruby Mine is not even on the list.

So, what in the world does "richest" mean? It is a meaningless term and often used by scammers to impress investors who know nothing about mining.

Do your own research, use third-party sources, and don't buy into the hype.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent NBRI News
More NBRI News