Lime Time, No one asked you to trust my sources. All here know you well enough before now to expect you wouldn't be much interested in a better truth than you have, and backed by some of the best evidence available. The fact you replied so quickly to the post says all that about you.
"I don't trust your sources, since you limit the source of info only to specific places and not the entire spectrum. So its completely biased to begin with to read info here. And I'm completely legal to feel that way. I know it's 30 against 2 here. That's why I keep coming back. I guess you will eventually ban me again, and that's very much frowned upon."
If you had anything new, interesting or thought provoking that would be welcome. In essence your "30 against 2" sets a battleground that does not exist. Your saying that's why you come back is unfortunate as to come to create conflict does no one any good. You will only be banned again if you become a board nuisance to the extent that responsible board management calls for it. And before now you should know comment on moderation here is not acceptable.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”