I understand that but it becomes community research which is a good way to guard against misinformation. Not that scammers couldnt be every account contributing to the information but thats why there needs to be sources for verification and whichever user facts checks something with misinformation repeatedly is removed (accountability). Its not meant to replace people doing their own research but aid it.
Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data? Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?