Wednesday, July 24, 2024 1:09:51 PM
Your assumption that his or anyone else's words are there to influence your opinions, shows that you are narrow minded. Are your expressed opinions here designed to influence anyone......or are they just your desire to express your opinions, regardless of who they do or don't influence? And does your constant posting to the pro side any less irritating to those who differ with your sentiments than the irritation you are showing when you accuse of repetitiveness? While there are a number of anti Vplm posters and it's an increasing number nowadays, unsurprisingly, there are far more pro vplm cheerleaders present. Do you not think they present an equally repetitive and provocative wall to be up against? And your also myopic conclusion that whether or not a poster owns shares is indicitive of their motives and that those motives are somehow nefarious.....is also fallacious on your part and a few others who have expressed that line of thought. I am one of the longest longs here and yet I am no longer pro vplm. There was a time when I was but not for long. And that fact was simply a matter of timing, as there was no apparent shenanigans going on when I got in, which was sometime before the acquisition, but it wasn't very long before the acquisition thing came up and Vplm committed the biggest lie I have ever seen in the stock market. It was far more a blatant lie than anything Bernie madoff did as his deeds were extremely stealthy so no one knew what was going on for a long time. Even the SEC couldn't figure him out and I believe it took them 4 investigations to finally unravel his scheme. But in vplm case, I found their lies obvious and blatant from the get go until the present, the get go being when the chang (ceo and president) acquisition PRs began and ran for almost 3 yrs chick full of one misleading lie after another, many of which I have posted here on numerous occasions
There are also other, indirect circumstances that reveal the impossibility of the patents being "all that", and "all that" has been very clearly defined by Vplm from way back as being technology easily worth upwards of a trillion dollars, using VPLM's own facts and figures, as I have also posted to support such contentions.
If, by chance, Vplm does indeed gain any money for shareholders due to infringement or other ways, it will be a tiny, totally embarrassing number that no one will smile about. More than likely thought, you will see nothing but the seaweed underwater. There's maybe a handful, like myself, who were smart enough or who wised up time to make some good money here by daytrading.
The only money making ability that vplm has and has ever shown, over many years, is that of creating fiat shares and directing them to themselves in a big way and selling them at huge profits. And that is all that will continue to ever happen here because that's what they set out to accomplish and they did it so well, it works and works and works. The patience is a virtue and Vplm is in its best position, crowd will continue to think that way, tho it's a dwindling crowd, and I for one, will continue to express my 100% honest viewpoint, which is just as worthy as your opinion.
There are also other, indirect circumstances that reveal the impossibility of the patents being "all that", and "all that" has been very clearly defined by Vplm from way back as being technology easily worth upwards of a trillion dollars, using VPLM's own facts and figures, as I have also posted to support such contentions.
If, by chance, Vplm does indeed gain any money for shareholders due to infringement or other ways, it will be a tiny, totally embarrassing number that no one will smile about. More than likely thought, you will see nothing but the seaweed underwater. There's maybe a handful, like myself, who were smart enough or who wised up time to make some good money here by daytrading.
The only money making ability that vplm has and has ever shown, over many years, is that of creating fiat shares and directing them to themselves in a big way and selling them at huge profits. And that is all that will continue to ever happen here because that's what they set out to accomplish and they did it so well, it works and works and works. The patience is a virtue and Vplm is in its best position, crowd will continue to think that way, tho it's a dwindling crowd, and I for one, will continue to express my 100% honest viewpoint, which is just as worthy as your opinion.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
Recent VPLM News
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 07:31:49 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/23/2026 05:07:30 PM
- VoIP-Pal Files Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions in Federal Antitrust and RICO Litigation • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/18/2026 04:14:27 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/16/2026 07:46:40 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/11/2026 11:18:22 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/17/2026 09:58:13 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/12/2026 10:21:42 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/06/2026 08:54:15 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2026 10:17:43 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2026 09:44:11 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2026 08:08:28 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/24/2025 01:13:41 AM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/23/2025 10:16:49 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/02/2025 09:11:21 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/29/2025 06:17:43 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/29/2025 05:53:57 PM
- Form 4/A - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/25/2025 09:50:14 PM
- VoIP-Pal Has Filed and Served Amended Antitrust Complaints Against Apple, Google, and Samsung • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/24/2025 12:00:00 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/17/2025 03:37:01 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 11:32:25 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 11:13:11 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 10:08:35 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 04:16:38 PM
