InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 36
Posts 20180
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: joev2 post# 41227

Sunday, 06/16/2024 10:47:33 AM

Sunday, June 16, 2024 10:47:33 AM

Post# of 41296
That's because youre not factoring that Zimmer was already behind the scenes pre-IPO. Thats a significant variable that is a factor here. Just cant say to what degree nor how its impacting things. You know for the longest time I was concerned about hostile parties which prompted Sonny to use various methods to protect Sintx IP. Anson femily of funds could be a hostile variable. Just depends if they are serving any interests other than their own.
What we can agree on is Sintx IPOd to use public markets to further fund development of IP and to derisk it more.

If you are going to properly analyze things here you have to give these variables their proper weight. You have a bias toward management and continue to show blinders to the value theyve created. You're also downplaying the impact the conspiracy of funds have had on the stockprice and Sintx image, shifting that blame to management, as funds continue to short and distort. I know youre going to say that i have a bias towards management, though it may seem that way, i can consider various angles but there lacks sufficient evidence. I am aligned with Sonny as long as he continues to develop Si3N4 IP for its eventual acquisition while Sintx is public. Im not aligned with Sintx going private again as ive said before. Private companies rarely have the resources to fund the cost of development. Hence why Sintx went public.

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News