hap0206, Why do you insist on denying the charges. On distorting the facts. On misleading our readers. Everyone of any worth who has expressed any interest in the case has agreed from the onset that gaining a unanimous verdict on the crimes Trump has committed would not be easy.
"We shall see what the jury decides, but the fact is Trump was reimbursing an employee for an expenditure made on his behalf -- Bragg has a big problem -- he has to name that expenditure as an election crime -- violations of the fed election laws can only be prosecuted by the feds -- I'll get the link -- so we wait for the decisions"
Fact is Trump was reimbursing an employee for an expenditure made on his behalf in order to illegally influence an election campaign. Why bring in federal election laws. As far as i understand it's NY state law the case is being bought under.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”
