InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,477.30
(
0.08%
)
US TECH 100
19,278.83
(
0.10%
)
Dow Jones
39,107.70
(
-0.07%
)
Brent Oil
84.88
(
-0.15%
)
Bitcoin
63,542.05
(
-1.97%
)
Post# of 93819
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Sentinel

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 67
Posts 18171
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/27/2001

Sentinel

Member Level

Re: Cassandra post# 50871

Wednesday, 11/12/2003 5:22:11 PM

Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:22:11 PM

Post# of 93819
As I said yesterday, I assume that e.Digital met with Gateway since it is local. For whatever reason, Gateway choose to go direct to am OEM and not go through e.Digital.

Is it just me, or did the above not make any sense? Which is your opinion? gateway dealt with EDIG first, or the OEM? As long as we're spouting opinions again, I happen to believe that Gateway did bring EDIG the business directly, because the O1K proved the tehcnology, but mandated using an Asian OEM they already deal with, to insure consistent quality control.

Who is this Time Being, and why are we always doing things for it?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up