News Focus
News Focus
Followers 190
Posts 62117
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: None

Thursday, 04/18/2024 2:54:52 PM

Thursday, April 18, 2024 2:54:52 PM

Post# of 579282
Have to wonder who's side this consultant is on? I say shittypant's side. I believe this is a lot more common than this consultant is claiming. Seems to be looking for angles there. A hundred years of jury selection isn't going to change for one orangedumbass.


Dismissing empaneled jurors after vetting them could point to flaw in jury selection process, consultant says

From CNN's Elise Hammond

One jury consultant said the dismissal of two seated jurors on Thursday morning could point to larger problems within the jury selection process as a whole.

One sworn-in juror was dismissed after expressing concerns that part of her identity was made public by the media. A second empaneled juror was excused after prosecutors questioned the truthfulness of the answers he gave to questions from attorneys on Tuesday.

Consultant Carolyn Koch said both of these cases underscore that this is “no ordinary trial,” but the act of disqualifying people after you’ve vetted them in court is a “symptom of a problem.”

She said in her experience with other high-profile cases involving political issues or serious crimes, written questionnaires were used. This allowed lawyers to have time to review the answers and vet people in advance before the actual jury selection process began in open court.

“They had time in advance to really scour the landscape to make sure that on the day of jury selection, people are properly vetted, so you are not going to have surprises like that,” Koch told CNN.

Using an oral questionnaire, by contrast, doesn't allow attorneys to learn much about prospective jurors beyond what they disclose themselves, Koch said.


https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-trial-04-18-24/index.html

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today