Monday, April 08, 2024 3:32:09 PM
Don't fall for the false dichotomy logical fallacy here. If Treasury isn't trying to maximize its profit, that does not mean that they will necessarily write off the senior prefs.
True maximization of Treasury's profit would be a restart of the cash NWS plus exchanging all but $1B of the liquidation preference of the seniors for 99.99999% of FnF's commons. Even I don't think that's going to happen.
Treasury writing off the seniors would be a minimization of their profits from this point forward. Instead of asking if Treasury is in the business of maximizing its profits, we should ask whether they are in the business of minimizing their profits. I think the answer to that is a clear "no".
Once again AIG provides a good comparison. Treasury did not act in such a way as to maximize its profits (because it only took a 92% stake in the common), but that didn't stop them from exchanging their AIG preferred shares for commons rather than write those shares off.
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM
VPR Brands (VPRB) Reports First Quarter 2024 Financial Results • VPRB • May 17, 2024 8:04 AM
ILUS Provides a First Quarter Filing Update • ILUS • May 16, 2024 11:26 AM