The Letter Agreements can be called SPSPA amendments, but you can't call the latter "SPS certificate" because they are DIFFERENT documents.
You keep on posting the SPS certificate of designations and calling it "SPSPA", punk.
Every stock has its Stock certificate of designations, that, in the case of the JPS, is called "prospectus" or directly, "contract".
This is why the 3rd Letter Agreement, is the 6th SPSPA amendment.
3rd SPSPA amendment, August 2012 (NWS dividend).
4th SPSPA amendment, December 2017 or 1st Letter Agreement.
5th SPSPA amendment, September 2019 or 2nd Letter Agreement.
6th SPSPA amendment, January 14, 2021 or 3rd Letter Agreement.
It's not my fault that someone came up with the bright idea of start calling them "Letter Agreements", thinking that, because it isn't called "PA amendment", the Statute the Limitations isn't reset, when, if it's an amendment of the terms and conditions on how the Treasury gets compensated, it's called "PA amendment".
The one in question (the 6th) it's not "the 4th amendment", mentioned by Justice Alito, who paved the way for the scammers to call the 4th amendment to the SPS certificate that came up weeks later (April 2021) without the presence of the UST secretary because it's an automatic deed, "4th SPSPA amendment". What you keep on doing.
What we are debating on, are the SPS Purchase Agreement amendments. The binding documents. Not the SPS certificate of designations that is amended as a result.
You have been caught in a conspiracy to involve secretary Yellen in the flawed 6th SPSPA amendment (Calabria-Mnuchin) and in turn, in all the prior PA amendment scheme, jointly with Guido, but you chose to play the fool as exit strategy, rogue plaintiff Mr. Pro Se (no other says "Broken record" and you always have a desire to reply to my posts with a turd, after being called out for your lies).
