InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 28507
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/28/2008

Re: DaJester post# 790853

Tuesday, 04/02/2024 3:41:25 PM

Tuesday, April 02, 2024 3:41:25 PM

Post# of 803611
Agree

my phrase ---- if GOV wants it can say - 300 on the 191 - paid off - retired

I like the extension of logic - makes sense to me

"if the NWS is a violation of the good faith of the common shareholder agreements, then the Treasury should not be put in a position to further engage in predatory practices by using a mechanism of a profit "sweep" into the LP, very similar to the sweep in cash."

(and maybe with a different judge the "return" can be more meaningful)