B402, You cherry pick one tiny bit, then post it out of context. That's a slimebag Trump tactic. "He rules against fani and that will prove the judge is compromised." Now tell us what in the greater body of Zorax's post you could possibly infer some bitch about
If the judge isn't a paid off conservative in dems clothing and if he has any real balls, he'll judge on the merits of whether her personal actions have any bearing on the charges of the case. There is no proof or evidence her personal actions were meant to profit from the case, nor did the other party, not were any of her actions meant to disrupt or influence within the case.
All they did was try to catch her in a lie, any lie whether it effects the case or not. The judge should rule on the case impact itself and not whether fani's daughters got fair treatment at home.
He should see what the shitassed lawyers and roman were trying to do and rule accordingly. He rules against fani and that will prove the judge is compromised. The case never should have seen his court.