| Followers | 193 |
| Posts | 21158 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 11/29/2010 |
Monday, February 26, 2024 10:01:43 PM
Mark Miller and his Two Stooges hijacked multiple dormant tickers (including BLLB) and used them to perpetrate short lived pump and dumps. They were ultimately caught, indicted and two sent to prison (Miller is still incarcerated) with one copping a plea for probation. A civil suit against them is still pending. Those facts are irrefutable. Whether that was the end of the matter may or may not be true. I see several unresolved questions:
1) Did the "3 Stooges" come up with this scheme all by themselves.. or did they have help, financing or training by someone else? If so, by who? After all, there are complicated filings and substantial fees required to bring a dormant ticker current. Miller -who had been hijacking for several years-- was 43 when indicted and ran a small construction company. One of the others owned a couple of "Fantastic Sam" hair cutting franchises. So where did the money and expertise come from?
2) Once the "3 Stooges" dumped their shares they handed off these tickers to others. Now NO ONE simply gives away a current ticker! So what was exchanged?
a) Money? Not likely IMO as that is usually traceable. However the SEC civil suit may prove me wrong
b) A piece of the action for the "3 Stooges" in the ticker that supposedly under new management? Again, not likely IMO. Or could it be---
c) control of the ticker by individuals or entities to whom a debt was owed? IMO this seems to make the most sense.
One of the tickers hijacked by the "3 Stooges" was UITA. One day it was suddenly run by a notorious, broke ass penny scammer who was already the sole officer of 6 or 7 (down from 12-13) --all of them utter garbage-- run from a spare bedroom in the smallish house he inherited from his parents in Plano, TX. He was broke before he got into penny scamming but was a skilled con man. IMO he never truly ''owned'' any of them. Rather, I believe he was given a stake in them for acting as front man/ Pumper-in-Chief, CCO (Chief Con Officer) for the shadowy people ("investors") who staked him with a cut of the action. One of those is the lawyer/ toxic financier/ reverse splitter on steroids that BLLB hired to get its ''caveat emptor'' warning removed.
I doubt anyone yet knows the whole truth about how these hijacked tickers were off loaded by the "3 Stooges" other than those directly involved... but there is a trail that can be followed.
As far as BLLB goes, I still think its history and ongoing relationship with the daughter of convicted thief/ forger/ disbarred lawyer and ex-con David R Rhodehamel will remain problematic for any legitimate merger candidate. How is it that Lily Rhodehamel --a 20 something video editor with no business management experience -- came to control 51% of the vote of BLLB via a corporation set up by the lawyer who defended her father who was sentenced to 6 years in prison.? https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173671074 And that's in addition to her/ it owning 100% of BLLB's ''preferred B shares" that convert into 990 Million common! How can she not be anything other than a front.. a straw woman/ shill doing her convicted criminal father's bidding?
And who thought acquiring David R Rhodehamel's "Jump Start Sports" was a spiffy idea and why?
Inquiring minds wannna know... fast buck flippers could care less :~)
1) Did the "3 Stooges" come up with this scheme all by themselves.. or did they have help, financing or training by someone else? If so, by who? After all, there are complicated filings and substantial fees required to bring a dormant ticker current. Miller -who had been hijacking for several years-- was 43 when indicted and ran a small construction company. One of the others owned a couple of "Fantastic Sam" hair cutting franchises. So where did the money and expertise come from?
2) Once the "3 Stooges" dumped their shares they handed off these tickers to others. Now NO ONE simply gives away a current ticker! So what was exchanged?
a) Money? Not likely IMO as that is usually traceable. However the SEC civil suit may prove me wrong
b) A piece of the action for the "3 Stooges" in the ticker that supposedly under new management? Again, not likely IMO. Or could it be---
c) control of the ticker by individuals or entities to whom a debt was owed? IMO this seems to make the most sense.
One of the tickers hijacked by the "3 Stooges" was UITA. One day it was suddenly run by a notorious, broke ass penny scammer who was already the sole officer of 6 or 7 (down from 12-13) --all of them utter garbage-- run from a spare bedroom in the smallish house he inherited from his parents in Plano, TX. He was broke before he got into penny scamming but was a skilled con man. IMO he never truly ''owned'' any of them. Rather, I believe he was given a stake in them for acting as front man/ Pumper-in-Chief, CCO (Chief Con Officer) for the shadowy people ("investors") who staked him with a cut of the action. One of those is the lawyer/ toxic financier/ reverse splitter on steroids that BLLB hired to get its ''caveat emptor'' warning removed.
I doubt anyone yet knows the whole truth about how these hijacked tickers were off loaded by the "3 Stooges" other than those directly involved... but there is a trail that can be followed.
As far as BLLB goes, I still think its history and ongoing relationship with the daughter of convicted thief/ forger/ disbarred lawyer and ex-con David R Rhodehamel will remain problematic for any legitimate merger candidate. How is it that Lily Rhodehamel --a 20 something video editor with no business management experience -- came to control 51% of the vote of BLLB via a corporation set up by the lawyer who defended her father who was sentenced to 6 years in prison.? https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173671074 And that's in addition to her/ it owning 100% of BLLB's ''preferred B shares" that convert into 990 Million common! How can she not be anything other than a front.. a straw woman/ shill doing her convicted criminal father's bidding?
And who thought acquiring David R Rhodehamel's "Jump Start Sports" was a spiffy idea and why?
Inquiring minds wannna know... fast buck flippers could care less :~)
Bearish
Consider me an IDIOT. Do not buy, sell or make any investment decision based any information or opinion I post. Conduct your own DD.
