In the filing, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis claims Joycelyn Wade, the estranged wife of special prosecutor Nathan Wade, has used their pending divorce as a means to harass and damage Willis' reputation and obstruct the election interference probe. Willis contends Wade’s ex-wife “conspired with interested parties in the criminal election interference case to use the civil discovery process to annoy, embarrass and oppress District Attorney Willis.”
That's definitely my contention, but I would have written it this way: "Certain maga gop congresspeople have paid and are behind the plans for Joy to use her pending divorce from Wade and with roman as a means to harass and damage Willis' reputation, the gop worked hard to find a judge and lawyer firm willing to take the money and bring the case".
Was that too truthful and blunt?