To simply say the SOL is 6 years dodges the operative part of the SOL, which is, a determination of when, legally, the 6 year period begins. There have been frequent determinations that the SOL begins when it became known or when it should have become known. My argument would be that in this particular case, there was no probable way that the victims would have known of the securities violation as it was, in effect, hidden from their attention. I think the courts would agree with that contention.
However, the point I really wish to make is this. I have always played by the rules and absolutely and unequivocally despise those who intentionally do not abide by the rules. Therefor, I am not going to join forces with a known and convicted securities violator, no matter how vociferously he/she tries to clothe themselves and their motives in righteousness. Obviously, they knowingly, callously and strictly for their own benefit, violated my rights before. Only a fool would trust that person again.
Abd, BTW, just who is my trooper friend? lololol
"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"
