Trump Media and Tech Group (NO Politics Allowed) (DJT)

[satter]

Nobody is talking about Presidential rape and murder.

Terrible context and analogy

Really? Terrible context and analogy?


Trump argued in Court in 2019 that he as President he should be immune from Criminal prosecution even if he murders someone in broad daylight with a gun.

Exactly the point I was making except I never even said Trump that you falsely accuse me of.

President Trump’s lawyer argued in court on Wednesday that he should, as president, be immune from criminal prosecution — even if he murders someone in broad daylight with a gun.

The argument was made as part of Trump v. Vance, a case asking whether Manhattan prosecutors can subpoena Trump’s tax records as part of an ongoing criminal investigation. In the case, as Judge Victor Marrero explained in an opinion, Trump’s lawyers argued that “the person who serves as President, while in office, enjoys absolute immunity from criminal process of any kind.” (Marrero rejected that argument.)

On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard Trump’s appeal of Marrero’s decision. During that hearing, Trump lawyer William Consovoy confirmed just how far his argument goes. In response to a question by appellate Judge Denny Chin, Consovoy argued that Trump is immune from criminal investigation even if he were to shoot someone on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue:

The question is a callback to Trump bragging in January 2016 that he could “stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and ... wouldn’t lose voters.”

Consovoy did concede that “once a president is removed from office” then he could be subject to criminal investigation. “This is not a permanent immunity,” in Consovoy’s words.

Nevertheless, when Chin asked whether “nothing could be done” while Trump remains in office, Consovoy stated, “That is correct.”

So now comes your fearless leader, a true coward, telling the court he has absolute immunity from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office including even if he murders someone in broad daylight with a gun.

This is who you support and you had the gall to say it was terrible context and analogy and then continued to spout about it when this was an extremely very valid point to illustrate.

Trump’s position is he can murder someone in broad daylight and he can't be prosecuted for it. He is a sicko. You keep promoting this lunatic mad man.

This Trump appointed Supreme Court is being tested here, his ridiculous bias jurors are on the line. This should be a no brainer, this decision.

There is no distinction. It applies to all Federal Criminal prosecution including murdering someone in broad sunlight with a gun. Any Supreme Court Justice giving approval to this concept whether it be Trump, King Biden, or future President is a disgrace.