That's a good summary of the situation. "The big difference there is that his lawyers are arguing for the 'double jeopardy' clause. [...] Sortagreen is also correct that the US Senate is NOT a court of law and his acquittal holds no bearing on him being charged again In a true court of law. [...]The only leg he has left to stand on is his claim that a President is somehow immune to crimes he committed while in office, which has never been ruled on before because we've never had a criminal aside from Nixon in office and Nixon got a pardon before that could all be tested by the Supreme Court. P - My guess is that's why SCOTUS agreed to consider the arguments so quickly. If they decide to take the argument up I still don't think they will rule in favor of the defendant because that's a very slippery slope if they set a precedent like that. Who's to say in the future that there isn't another criminal in the white house who murders or rapes someone? Does he just wind up walking scot free? I don't think so. Nobody is above the law."
Agree totally. See also, again
Special Counsel Jack Smith Petitions the Supreme Court to rule on Trump’s Immunity Defense [...]On Dec. 11, the government filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court requesting the Court resolve the question of whether former president Donald Trump is immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office. The Justice Department is seeking to bypass the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, filing the petition before that court has ruled. The government also filed a motion for expedited consideration of the petition by the Supreme Court and an “expedited merits briefing if the Court grants the petition.” Additionally, the Justice Department filed a motion to expedite Trump's appeal of Judge Chutkan’s ruling in the D.C. Circuit. On Dec. 1, Judge Chutkan rejected .. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/chutkan-denies-trump-s-motions-to-dismiss .. Trump’s motion to dismiss the federal election interference case against him on the grounds of presidential immunity. Trump filed an appeal .. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/docket-watch-trump-prosecuted-in-d.c .. of her ruling in the D.C. Circuit on Dec. 7. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173407508
We'll see how good blackhawks is on this one:
My take on the matter from my post on another board...... And every SCOTUS member who argues against precedent will need to come up with something extraordinary to justify their position. After all NIXON WAS a sitting president and it didn't count for shit. P - I see a 7-2 vote with Alito and Thomas dissenting, just because.....assholes. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173407879
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”