Framework Agreement Rules for Determining Tier Y Alternative Outcome(" The first is that DB 8 is described as an informal representative of other 9 persons interested in the same way", or" you haven’t advertised the fact of this congregation" or "Your Lordship is 18 right that DB’s position has always been not a formal 19 representative of the ECAPS holders."):
The Parties will use reasonable endeavours to agree and incorporate into the Framework Agreement provision as to the economic split of Tier Y and Tier Z in the event that, at the conclusion of the current court directions application process (including any appeals) there is neither an ECAPS Outcome nor an LBHI Outcome to Priority Legal Issue 1. 👉️If the Parties are unable to agree such split by the time of signing the Framework Agreement,👈️ the Framework Agreement shall include a provision requiring the Parties in such a scenario to consult and negotiate in good faith to reach agreement as to the distribution of Tier Y and Tier Z consistent with the Framework Agreement and any judgment or order which the court/appellate court may have made on Priority Legal Issue 1.