Friday, February 23, 2007 10:57:47 AM
Yo EZ...are you smiling? :)
Suits Over `light' Cigarettes Tossed
Thursday February 22, 6:22 pm ET
By Alan Sayre, AP Business Writer
Suits Over `light' Cigarettes Thrown Out
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Suits filed against two cigarette makers over the marketing of "light" cigarettes have been thrown out by a federal appeals court.
Earlier this month, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the 2003 suits filed by two people against the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. and by five people against Phillip Morris USA Inc.
Although the suits alleged the companies had falsely marketed "light" cigarettes as safer, none of the plaintiffs claimed they had been injured from smoking or sought compensation for medical expenses. Rather, they sought damages based upon alleged false marketing.
In August 2005, U.S. District Judge James Trimble of Lake Charles dismissed part of the suits, saying the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act does not cover conduct in compliance with federal law.
But the judge rejected the companies' stand that since their marketing practices were in compliance with Federal Trade Commission regulations, the suits should be thrown out entirely. The 5th Circuit panel, which heard both cases in a combined appeal, disagreed and returned them to Trimble for dismissal.
David Howard, a spokesman for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., which acquired Brown & Williamson in 2004, said the 5th Circuit "has made clear that lawsuits attacking the term 'light' and the marketing of 'light' cigarettes are at odds with the comprehensive cigarette labeling system that Congress has established. As a result, any such lawsuits are barred under federal law."
A spokeswoman for Philip Morris, a unit of Altria Group Inc., said the company could not comment immediately.
Plaintiff attorneys were not available for immediate comment.
"It's a pretty thorough victory for the companies," said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor who specializes in products liability law. "The 5th Circuit completely throws out the case. That's my reading. The tobacco companies are doing pretty well in these light cases."
Last year, the Illinois Supreme Court threw out a $10 billion verdict against Phillip Morris in a state class-action lawsuit that involved 1.1 million people who bought "light" cigarettes in Illinois. The plaintiffs in the Louisiana cases wanted to represent anyone who had purchased a pack of "light" cigarettes in the state since 1971.
The 5th Circuit's decision, dated Feb. 14, was posted on the court's Web site on Thursday.
Suits Over `light' Cigarettes Tossed
Thursday February 22, 6:22 pm ET
By Alan Sayre, AP Business Writer
Suits Over `light' Cigarettes Thrown Out
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- Suits filed against two cigarette makers over the marketing of "light" cigarettes have been thrown out by a federal appeals court.
Earlier this month, a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the 2003 suits filed by two people against the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. and by five people against Phillip Morris USA Inc.
Although the suits alleged the companies had falsely marketed "light" cigarettes as safer, none of the plaintiffs claimed they had been injured from smoking or sought compensation for medical expenses. Rather, they sought damages based upon alleged false marketing.
In August 2005, U.S. District Judge James Trimble of Lake Charles dismissed part of the suits, saying the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act does not cover conduct in compliance with federal law.
But the judge rejected the companies' stand that since their marketing practices were in compliance with Federal Trade Commission regulations, the suits should be thrown out entirely. The 5th Circuit panel, which heard both cases in a combined appeal, disagreed and returned them to Trimble for dismissal.
David Howard, a spokesman for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., which acquired Brown & Williamson in 2004, said the 5th Circuit "has made clear that lawsuits attacking the term 'light' and the marketing of 'light' cigarettes are at odds with the comprehensive cigarette labeling system that Congress has established. As a result, any such lawsuits are barred under federal law."
A spokeswoman for Philip Morris, a unit of Altria Group Inc., said the company could not comment immediately.
Plaintiff attorneys were not available for immediate comment.
"It's a pretty thorough victory for the companies," said Carl Tobias, a University of Richmond law professor who specializes in products liability law. "The 5th Circuit completely throws out the case. That's my reading. The tobacco companies are doing pretty well in these light cases."
Last year, the Illinois Supreme Court threw out a $10 billion verdict against Phillip Morris in a state class-action lawsuit that involved 1.1 million people who bought "light" cigarettes in Illinois. The plaintiffs in the Louisiana cases wanted to represent anyone who had purchased a pack of "light" cigarettes in the state since 1971.
The 5th Circuit's decision, dated Feb. 14, was posted on the court's Web site on Thursday.
Recent MO News
- Altria Celebrates America by Investing in Our Growers, Communities, Employees and Iconic Brands • Business Wire • 04/27/2026 07:15:00 PM
- Altria to Host Webcast of 2026 First-Quarter Results • Business Wire • 04/16/2026 02:00:00 PM
- Form ARS - Annual Report to Security Holders • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 01:11:16 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 01:02:06 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 01:00:30 PM
- on! PLUS™ Expands Nationwide Retail Availability • Business Wire • 03/23/2026 07:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 06:38:41 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/05/2026 04:10:23 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/02/2026 08:47:47 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/02/2026 08:47:39 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/02/2026 08:47:34 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/02/2026 08:47:18 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/02/2026 08:47:11 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/02/2026 08:47:06 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/27/2026 06:07:44 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/27/2026 06:07:38 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/27/2026 06:07:29 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/27/2026 06:07:22 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/27/2026 06:07:16 PM
- Altria Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend of $1.06 Per Share • Business Wire • 02/26/2026 06:00:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/18/2026 07:30:08 PM
- Altria Presents as Part of the Consumer Analyst Group of New York Conference; Reaffirms 2026 Full-Year Earnings Guidance • Business Wire • 02/18/2026 12:00:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2026 07:55:27 PM
- Why Smart Capital is Ditching Sugar for Science • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/06/2026 02:32:26 PM


