"My opinions are what I express in my posts....each and every one of them. BUT...I was wrong once and could be wrong again sometime so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so."
You need to update your siggy to say: ".....could be wrong again and again and again and again... "
You were wrong b4 and are still wrong. I schooled you in the facts but you chose to play hookey. I never thought I would agree with Emu or him me, but I accidently came across this... It is an excerpt from an article written by guess who?.......your savior, lord Emu of Egypt. It 100% says what I told you and fully contradicts your fallacious contentions. I schooled you but you didn't bother to either back up your contentions with some supporting facts or to apologize and agree. Pay closest attention to the bold and highlighted parts.
___________________________________________________________
"Leave Patents to the USPTO
Courts should never be tasked with dealing with the complexities of patent validity because they lack the necessary technical expertise.
Patent validity issues such as sections 101, 102, 103, indefiniteness, and all other technical matters should be decided prior to a patent being issued by technically qualified examiners at the USPTO, not by the court. Once issued, a patent should only be challengeable at the USPTO, and only for a predetermined period, i.e. six months. The courts should only decide matters of infringement and damages.
No aspects of patent law should ever be subjective. Congress can fix the inconsistencies between the USPTO and the courts and put them on the same page by passing laws that clearly define patent validity guidelines, i.e. what is abstract. Life in the 21st century is dependent on computers. Consequently, many software-centric patents adding new inventive steps are being developed, only to be labeled abstract by the courts and invalidated. The lack of uniformity is responsible for nullifying valuable patents and strengthening the chokehold the Silicon Valley has on the necks of small inventors. Courts should only deal with infringement and damages based solely on clearly these defined guidelines."
________________________________________________________________
Above is in compete agreement with what I told you when you said I need to learn patent law. Actually, I know very little about patent law. What I had told you was based completely on common sense.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
