Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Additionally and FYI, the uspto is considered to be the ultimate experts on patent validity. That's been discussed here numerous times. And......it so happens that the IPRs were indeed trials held in courts. Someone took that idea to task once and I researched it and they definitely were trials in a court and their decisions stated they upheld the validity of the patents although I disagree with that verbiage. As far as I'm concerned, the validity of the patents was challenged by various companies and they lost all the challenges which meant that vplm neither gained nor lost anything other than bragging rights and I'm told also stopped rights. But when those IPRs were ruled upon by the judges, a tribunal, they had nothing more than they had before the challenges. They were left with exactly the same thing they had the moment the patents changed from application to patent. A patent is valid otherwise it would not be a patent, period. And I also don't believe the uspto said that only a judge can rule on validity and not the uspto. I think that's patently wrong. A patent is valid until it's made invalid such as in an IPR.

Please show anything that in the law that states otherwise. I don't believe you can and if you can't, then most likely you have learned wrongly about this. I'm perfectly willing to admit I'm wrong if you can show proof. My take is so obviously correct, it seems, that I'm way sure it's right.