Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

I have been here for close to 13 yrs on this. I'm no patent law expert for sure but I've done more DD, research, reading on as many aspects as I can wrap my head around so that I know what I'm talking about when I make statements and for my own knowledge and understanding. I've researched a huge amount of people more than you can shake a stick at. However, in this case, all I need is my common sense IMHO. I'm absolutely certain that a patent is VALID the moment it is born, same as a baby is a human the moment it is born. The difference is you can't take away being human but you can invalidate patents. That said, a patent is as valid as a newborn baby is human. I take issue 100% with you stating that a patent is not valid when parenthood is issued. Of course it is. It's a simple definition of the word valid. A patent is valid in every way shape and form until such time that a judge in an IPR trial or some other legal means finds some reason to invalidate a patent. Just the term invalidate implies initial validity. Common sense dictates that a patent award by the uspto makes it a valid patent. I challenge you to show otherwise anything under the law that supports your contention that a patent is not valid when it becomes a patent. To me, that notion is absurd. I highly doubt you can show something to support it's not valid. Ridiculous I say.