Exactly. Like I said, I'd be curious to see what the company offers as 'fair value'. Here are some of my additional thoughts:
Why even include this verbiage if you were just going to offer scraps for the shares? That makes no sense.
What if they determined the fair value currently to be .001+, based on their IPs and the restructuring in Delaware? That would have a number of effects, for one it would tell the market there's a floor at said price, and it would fix the chart and put the stock back in position to test/break .002 (or .10 post split). It would be a win/win scenario, and imo if the company truly believes in what they're doing, then this would make sense.
It's something to keep an eye on, and if anyone does properly dissent, I would love to see the correspondence.