InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253281
Next 10
Followers 839
Posts 120535
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: xrymd post# 42372

Thursday, 02/22/2007 2:07:31 PM

Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:07:31 PM

Post# of 253281
> ARTE – Did they break out what the AE's were and were they readily treatable and did they persist?<

Ms. Goostree did not talk about AEs on the webcast except in passing. The 2.1% rate of moderate/severe AEs came from slide #14, which shopws the 5-year follow-up. Based on 145 patients, 8.3% (12 pts) had mild AEs, 1.4% (2 pts) had moderate AEs, and 0.7% (1 patient) had severe AEs.

However, ARTE is cheating by using 145 in the denominator of these calculations because only 119 of the 145 patients were followed for 5 years (#msg-16686689). Using 119 in the denominator, the rate of moderate/severe AEs is 3/119 = 2.5%.

The real rate of moderate/severe AEs is probably even higher than this because the patients who were followed for 5 years constitute a biased subset of the 145-patient pool.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.