Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[kthomp19]

Really? Wouldn't that depend on the likely success of the alleged Constitutional Violation or have you already figured out every POSSIBLE Constitutional Challenge and exactly how the Federal Judiciary will rule?

Constitutional violations wouldn't be subject to the 4617(f) bar, so that doesn't apply to what we were talking about.

What part of the Constitution would a senior-to-common conversion violate anyway? If you say "takings" or "illegal exaction" then once again the dilution couldn't be undone because those things are always after-the-fact claims; the case would rest on the idea that the dilution was the takings so standing would depend on the dilution happening.