There is much more accurate informed information in those two articles (and in other posts around them) than in the agenda-driven content of your post.
Noted also both the articles in your post, the Murdoch (says it all) NY Post and that effort from the far-far-right rag The Western Journal are dated 2021, the post directly above is much more up-to-date. It is clearly also much more balanced, in that it offers disagreement among considered experts in the field. Read it. If honest you cannot but agree.
Secondly your personal comment gives very unwelcome (we have banned one poster in particular for repeatedly posting covid mitigation misinformation) misinformation regarding masks mitigation effect and covid. So don't.
"But besides telling us all masks help and now knowing that they have zero affect for these viruses..."
See any number of posts on the board on that asinine comment of yours there. A couple:
[...]... 8 COVID-19 Face Mask Myths, Debunked [...]Myth 2: Cloth masks are useless P - Though a cloth covering alone may not completely prevent someone from spreading the coronavirus, it still reduces the likelihood. If a cloth mask is all you have, it can still work as a physical barrier by absorbing respiratory droplets that carry the coronavirus. P - "Any mask is better than no mask," CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said at a COVID-19 briefing. Her agency recommends well-fitted masks, which can include multiple layers of cloth masks. [That from Walensky would seem to be common sense to more people than not.] Still, the most protective masks are N95 respirators... With more, May 2022 - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168863510
Then, in your personal comment, came your your misinformation as to "gain of function" which you before now should have expected we obviously would have covered more comprehensively than you would ever contemplate doing for yourself. See above.
"...here is some items below you perhaps did not know about. Gain of function research lying to congress"
Any lies to congress only came from your side of politics.
"...and then one month later the NIH affirming that was in fact the case, you must have missed those items hey. Alot out there for you to read if one has the time and from multiple sources so please do not take my word on it these just simply exist in our world as is."
No, after reading the info up top you now know there is profound disagreement on whether or not the NIH even financed gain of function at Wuhan, let alone affirming it as you incorrectly stated there. Further why would you first say we may have missed it and then in the same breath almost say "we must have missed them." You let your thoughts run away with you.
Finally your
"Not sure where you have been over these past years this is all old news except the latest from the CIA payments to folks to change their tune on their decisions over creation of this virus via whistleblower testimony. "
is no more than ignorant conspiracist gobbledygook. You believe you know better than experts, perhaps because you believe you are particularly unique. Perhaps you are one of the lizard people, yet you don't even know it yourself .. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172816225 .
Cool it. Consider.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.