News Focus
News Focus
Followers 41
Posts 22096
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: boston745 post# 39972

Saturday, 09/09/2023 11:19:10 PM

Saturday, September 09, 2023 11:19:10 PM

Post# of 42660
The following information will show that the United States staged a false flag on September 11th, 2001 with the intention of setting up the justification for it to leave the ABM treaty so it could deploy a grid of satellites to work like two strategic initiatives, Brilliant Eyes & Brilliant Pebbles know today as Starshield.

1. Reagan began the Star Wars (SDI) program which wanted to deploy a space based anti-ballistic missile system to render other countries nuclear arsenal pointless.
2. That the 1972 ABM treaty prevented the deployment of a spaced based ABM system.
3. That President Clinton tried to renegotiate the terms of the ABM with President Putin. However presidential candidate George Bush Jr declared his intention to deploy a space based ABM system regardless of legal ramifications whether Putin agreed to amend the treaty of not.
4. An event was needed to withdraw from the ABM Treaty...September 11th, 2001 planes were flown into the two main towers of the World Trade Center. Blaming this on terrorists gave the US government the justification it needed to withdraw from the 1972 ABM treaty.
5. December 13th 2001, the United States declared its intention to withdraw from the 1972 ABM treaty after the six months required by the treaty.
6. June 2002 the United States officially withdrew from the ABM treaty with the intention of deploying a space based ABM system. SpaceX began that same month! Once SpaceX deploys Gen 2 satellites, they’ll likely be equipped with ABM laser defense systems currently in development to also function as Brilliant Pebbles; Starshield will already have the sensors needed to be used as Brilliant Eyes


1. Star Wars Program

A.

The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization (SDIO) was set up in 1984 within the US Department of Defense to oversee development. A wide array of advanced weapon concepts, including lasers,[4][5] particle beam weapons and ground- and space-based missile systems were studied, along with various sensor, command and control, and high-performance computer systems that would be needed to control a system consisting of hundreds of combat centers and satellites spanning the entire globe and involved in a very short battle.



2. 1972 ABM treaty prevented space based ABM systems

B.

What the ABM Treaty Permitted
• One regional defense of 100 ground-based missile interceptors to protect either the capital or an ICBM field
• A total of 15 missile interceptor launchers at designated missile defense test ranges
• Research, laboratory, and fixed land-based testing of any type of missile defense


3. Presidents Clinton & Bush Jr.
C.

It should want to do so while Clinton is in office. The U.S. desire to build a missile defense will not go away. While a Democratic president is unlikely to offer Moscow more, a Republican will certainly offer less. Texas Gov. George W. Bush has already said he will proceed with deployment come what may, and his chief foreign-policy advisor has dismissed the ABM treaty as a “relic” of the Cold War.


In 2000, President Clinton tried to withdraw from the ABM treaty, using Iran as a potential threat. Meanwhile, George Bush Jr declared his intention to develop an ABM system regardless of the treaty.
D.

During his presidential campaign, Bush said he would offer amendments on the treaty to Russia and would withdraw the United States from the accord if Russia rejected the proposed changes. However, the Bush administration never proposed amendments to the treaty in its talks with Russia on the subject. 


It looks like the Bush administration was determined to find a way to withdraw from the ABM treaty despite claiming it would try to amend the treaty first. Under two months after Bush became president, an episode of a TV show called ‘The Lone Gunmen’ aired March 4th, 2001 depicting a plot by the US government to fly airplanes into the two towers with the intention to increase worldwide hostilities to increase arms sales. Since 9/11 the war on terror began along with increased arm sales across the world but especially by the major powers.

4. Requirement for Withdrawal and the Creating Context for Withdrawal?

E.

Article XV, paragraph 2, gives each Party the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of the treaty have jeopardized its supreme interests.


September 11th, 2001 the World Trade Center was attacked. According to Dr Judy Woods, whom has accumulated a fair bit of evidence, the towers did not collapse due to airplanes flying into them. Instead the buildings mostly turned to dust. This explains both why you can literally see the building chunks turn into dust while falling and why there was so little debris on the ground. As well it explain why there was little in the way of seismic activity recorded during September 11th.
The exact technology is unknown to those without the security clearance but its technology that is adjacent to the work of Mr. John Hutchison experiments with in his home lab. Essentially some sort of electromagnetics were employed to rapidly age the materials turning them back to dust. This electrolytic corrosion is even seen in electric vehicles because of their larger EM fields compared to that of combustion vehicles.
Also worth noting was the large put positions placed on the Airline industry and specifically Delta and American Airlines in the days leading up to 9/11.
F.

The real answer to that question will never be known as few direct measurements were taken of the plume that followed the disintegration of the two towers into a blizzard of dust, though air samples were collected in subsequent weeks and months


However you can see the source of the dust is not from the objects hitting the ground pulverizing it, it was in fact disintegrated in air where the bulk of the dust originated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2IMiQzFu6I

5. Withdrawal form the 1972 ABM treaty

G.

Today, I have given formal notice to Russia, in accordance with the treaty, that the United States of America is withdrawing from this almost 30-year-old treaty. I have concluded the ABM Treaty hinders our government’s ability to develop ways to protect our people from future terrorist or rogue-state missile attacks.


Today, as the events of September the 11th made all too clear, the greatest threats to both our countries come not from each other, or other big powers in the world, but from terrorists who strike without warning, or rogue states who seek weapons of mass destruction.
We know that the terrorists, and some of those who support them, seek the ability to deliver death and destruction to our doorstep via missile. And we must have the freedom and the flexibility to develop effective defenses against those attacks. Defending the American people is my highest priority as Commander in Chief, and I cannot and will not allow the United States to remain in a treaty that prevents us from developing effective defenses.



6. Development & Deployment of constellation of satellites

H.

President Bush marked the U.S. withdrawal from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty Thursday by affirming his intention to develop and deploy a limited missile defense system as quickly as possible.


I.

According to Musk’s calculations, he could undercut existing launch companies by building a modest-size rocket that specialized in carrying smaller satellites and research payloads to space. In June 2002 he founded Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX. He was on his way to Mars.


J.

Brilliant Pebbles envisioned satellite interceptors designed to demolish ballistic missiles in their midcourse and terminal phases of flight. The Strategic Defense Initiative Organization's space-based interceptor was limited to a technology base program, with the objective only of developing technologies as security against potential future threats."
Brilliant Eyes, however, drew more interest from Air Force space officials who sought to improve theater space surveillance capabilities after Desert Storm. The Brilliant Eyes concept called for a "distributed" satellite network consisting of several hundred spacecraft with infrared and laser sensors orbiting at 700 kilometers, capable of tracking missiles in their midcourse phase, discriminating among reentry vehicles and decoys, and predicting impact points. Like national reconnaissance assets, these satellites would also perform an arms control monitoring function.


K.

In February 2018, Griffin was appointed as Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering by Donald Trump. One of his first actions was to create the Space Development Agency.[14][15] The organization was tasked with procuring a proliferated constellation of low Earth orbit satellites to defend against Chinese and Russian hypersonic weapons. Commercial contracts for the constellation were given to L3Harris and SpaceX to build Starlink military satellites.[16] CIA Director Mike Pompeo called the project a “Strategic Defense Initiative for our time, the SDI II".[17]


L.

The paper noted that there were concerns that the high number of satellites planned for the Starlink constellation could overwhelm China’s efforts to monitor and track their activity. Researchers highlighted fears that Starlink satellites could be used as maneuverable weapons to strike targets in orbit, or to surveil the space environment. It bears noting that Starlink was primarily developed as a civilian communications system, though it does have significant military applications like most communications systems do. By sheer virtue of their extreme number and their manuverability, Starlink satellites pose a risk that others simply don’t. SpaceX has also been contracted by the US to develop military satellites, further raising the hackles of foreign countries.


References:

A. https://web.archive.org/web/20230906051056/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative
B. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/abmtreaty
C. https://web.archive.org/web/20230726063815/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-apr-02-op-15129-story.html
D. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/abmtreaty
E. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002-01/us-withdrawal-abm-treaty-president-bush%E2%80%99s-remarks-us-diplomatic-notes
F. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-was-in-the-world-trade-center-plume/
G. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2002-01/us-withdrawal-abm-treaty-president-bush%E2%80%99s-remarks-us-diplomatic-notes
H. https://greensboro.com/bush-pulls-out-of-missile-treaty/article_0fbecf30-e0af-5ea8-ab06-a4e1d9198a48.html
I. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-elon-musk-spacex/
J. https://greensboro.com/bush-pulls-out-of-missile-treaty/article_0fbecf30-e0af-5ea8-ab06-a4e1d9198a48.html
K. https://web.archive.org/web/20230322195913/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_D._Griffin
L. https://hackaday.com/2023/06/22/china-plans-its-own-megaconstellation-to-challenge-starlink/

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News