AI
Tuesday, August 22, 2023 8:22:34 PM
Now that $GVSI is current, we can move forward with discussions with our target merger candidate, whom we will not identify until/if there is an agreement. $GVSI has no way to know how long this may take or even if an agreement will come to fruition.
— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) February 7, 2023
...should be believed as about as much as his tweet saying he would get GVSI SEC registered and reporting, that he would refile GVSI's SEC Form 10 registration statement and never did, saying that WNFT had reached the "promised land" and would have a "business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s)." that never materialized in September of last year when he said it would and when he said he would not reverse split GRDO then did just that.
During the SEC review it was discovered that the designation of a class of pref shares issued by $GVSI's previous management is missing. On the SEC's advice, management has decided to withdraw the Form 10 and refile in December so that corrections can be made with the Nevada SOS. https://t.co/MhVwRI4NW1
— American Blockchain Corporation (@OTCpinkGVSI) November 23, 2021
The name change is the promised land and we are now ready to entertain mergers.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) July 8, 2022
The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.
— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) August 19, 2022
There will be no reverse split, dilution or toxic debt taken on so long as I am involved with $GRDO. Update filings will reflect a zero balance sheet. PRs are forthcoming.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) October 5, 2018
I regret giving the impression that $GRDO would not r/s, but unfortunately, it was the only way to get things done. Why would the shareholders want as much as 800 million shares in dead certificates? The only purpose that serves is to make it more expensive to raise money.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 9, 2019
I will never be involved with a company that wipes out the shareholders through a reverse split. $FORW $TSNP
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 2, 2020
Notice that Sharp again said that he would never reverse split any of his stocks when he had already reverse split GRDO. Is that being honest?
And now we have this from the latest quarterly report.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/378041/content
List any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, acquisition, spin-off, or reorganization either currently anticipated or that occurred within the past 12 months:
NONE
No merger to speak about - at all. Could GVSI's FINRA Rule 6490 violation and FINRA's Notice of Deficiency have something to do with this? Or is it the bloated AS of 7 BILLION AS and 2.4 BILLION OS that has something to do with it, or could if be that no serious company would want to do a reverse merger with a company that is not SEC registered and reporting with six years of missing financials?
We have incurred nominal operations since custodianship and will actively search for suitable merger candidates to assist in the sustaining of operations. The Company is being funded solely by its CEO as of June 30, 2023, and has been since the custodianship was effective.
So not only is there no merger candidate, the search for one hasn't even started.
