So you're going to quit your pathetic lies trying to portray him as misquoting when you are intentionally comparing two separate things?
Yeah, delerious1 is just following the pumper MO of distorting information - information that even when distorted doesn't change the context or meaning of what the law firm wrote.
I provided links to verify everything that I posted with corroborating information from a second corporate finance law firm that wrote basically the same information - GVSI has to account for all of its financials including the six years which are missing. I even went to the extent of supplying screen captures to prove that I'm quoting everything from the corporate finance law firm correctly which proves that GVSI has severe and existential problems with the SEC and FINRA.
That's why delerious1 is pissed off and splitting hairs.
But what can you expect from someone who even misspells his alias - "delerious" LOL!