Nah bro it prompted me to reply first on your very flawed trade strategy analysis and I was like this guy doesn't know anything about trading the markets at all by the way he said his analysis and why is he talking a lot.
As I read some more I just realized that everything about your argument is so flawed because you based everything on speculation, that's why I kept replying lol
Maybe I just didn't like your energy on the way you placed your argument because it was so flawed.
How can you passionately argue something that you haven't really verified at all.
A post here is not verifiable information. It's just a lead. It's up to you to verify it. You haven't verified anything at all.
I could make up a post here that such and such company is offering 100% a month, then people would just assume that is factual and go run with it?
Nah bro that's not how you do things. Facts not speculations bro.