I'm not accusing you, but what makes more sense? Someone getting paid per post to trash a stock? Or someone getting paid to defend it?
How many people would benefit from the shareholders price going up, versus how many would benefit from it going down? Keeping in mind shorting an OTC penny stock is unlikely and maybe impossible. No point in driving the price down. No, there are far more that would pay to see it go up. Therefore, logically, you are more likely the paid per post bull.
Painting rosey but unrealistic portrayals of the company even to the point of deception.