Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Well, it could be that little changes, in that case it could hardly be described as a huge win for justice in America. Gotta say, chuckle,
if it does in the end turn out to be a big win for Trump's team and also for justice in America that would be a first. eh. An incredible first!

That said i don't see how after reading what you have you could say

" And don't forget, this agreement was negotiated and hashed out after months of negotiation. After all that, it is hard
for me to believe that there could have been any misunderstanding between the prosecution and defense teams.

No one could forget the months of negotiation. And seems to me it's clear there was misunderstanding. Also on that, aren't you saying you think one side must have been faking their understanding of the deal before Noreika took it to where she did. Or both sides. In that case which side do you think would have changed their understanding of the plea deal. Or both.

Then you say "One more question lends light to how nefarious this immunity was."

Heh, after suggesting i was showing bias by stating the simple fact that Noreika was appointed by Trump now you say the deal is nefarious. LOL It's clear which of us looks more biased here. On that don't forget both the judge and the DA were appointed by Trump. And that Weiss was one of only two Trump appointed DAs not asked to resign by the Biden administration ..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/biden-trump-us-attorneys-resign/2021/02/09/a8c5adcc-6af1-11eb-9f80-3d7646ce1bc0_story.html .

And why do you say the judge's action was such a huge deal when apparently though it is unusual, it is not unusual for that kind of case. See:

Hunter Biden plea hearing features dramatic twists and turns, and a cliffhanger ending
The plea hearing was supposed to resolve a five-year federal investigation of Biden over tax
and gun charges, but the judge wanted to review the agreement after disputes between the lawyers.
Bart Jansen Xerxes Wilson Meredith Newman USA TODAY July 27, 2023
[...]“It’s very unusual for a plea deal to collapse like this in front of a judge, but it’s not that unusual in these types of cases,” where concern over the ultimate sentence to be imposed may exist because a defendant could potentially be the subject of investigations in multiple jurisdictions, said Joe Valenti, a former federal counterterrorism analyst who is now a partner at Saul Ewing. .. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/07/27/hunter-biden-plea-hearing-drama/70473317007/

On the diversion, since the gun charge was the charge being diverted this:

"It states that the government would "agree not to criminally prosecute Biden outside of the terms of this agreement for any federal crimes encompassed by the attached statement of facts, Attachment A to the Diversion Agreement, and the statement of facts attached as Exhibit 1 to the Memorandum of Plea Agreement filed this same day," the judge read in court." https://abcnews.go.com/US/hunter-biden-plea-agreement/story?id=101718321

from your link seems reasonable. Speaking from relative ignorance, of course.

Will just add there from reading so far i gathered the real issue for Noreika on the diversion of the gun charge was that she was to oversee Biden during his period of immunity/diversion. And that she didn't think that should be her responsibility. At least that was one of her major concerns with the plea deal.