News Focus
News Focus
Followers 22
Posts 1813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2017

Re: Crash and berns post# 33005

Wednesday, 07/12/2023 6:24:39 PM

Wednesday, July 12, 2023 6:24:39 PM

Post# of 33478
Typical empty cease and desist letter.

The Substantial Truth Doctrine is a very good defense against defamation. I ask what statement you made is materially false? They either paid you or they didn't. They either owe you money or they don't. They either have stopped communicating or they haven't. Your posted statements regarding their responses are either accurate or not.

Is it malicious to post that a company has not paid a debt owed to an investor and such investor is seeking to identify other potentially defrauded and/or owed investors for the purpose of filing a class action lawsuit against the company?

My question is if you are a consultant to the company and said company owes you $50,000 does such agreement become null and void? Or does the agreement end? I would terminate any agreement as soon as possible.

Seems to me like the company is using empty threats via strongly worded cease and desist letters to prevent an investor from pooling other investors into a larger class action lawsuit. Of course the company has not calculated the damages it has incurred, they don't exist. Decline in trading volume? Nope, this ticker has no volume. Decline in stock price? Nope, this ticker has lost 99.9% of its value since Alan reversed the stock 1-1,000 and lied about uplisting to NASDAQ.

In fact, your statements are important to any other potential investor in ENDV. If they can't and/or will not pay a contractor debt owed to him, what makes any potential investor trust that they will pay them back?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y