Nope, just her looking at the balance of facts as objectivity offers.
"So, you are a member of "get Trump, no matter what" crowd -- now it goes to the courts -- it appears to be a constitutional question -- Trump appears to have solid legal grounds -- another whiff with BIG consequences "
Trump does not appear to have solid legal grounds when looked at by law-abiding non-compromised judges.
Your federalist gaslighter rationalization is a sad attempt to confuse. And just more indictment of the America which would bend without boundary to see a criminal go free. Yet again.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”