Friday, June 02, 2023 2:33:14 PM
The patents are real! The patents are real! The patents are valid! The patents are valid!
This has been the clarion call from the gjtgo... Its so misunderstood by so many for so long, it's amazing, given that the truth of the matter has been explained, with facts over ignorance, so many times here...
1st of all, of course the patents are real, lolol.....they can't be anything but real. A real patent is born when an application gets approved by the uspto, based on a short list of criteria the application must meet. I have reported many times that such patent criteria and approval does NOT in any way, shape or form, imply, suggest, prove or validate that the patent includes EFFICACY, VALUE or WORKABILITY... That is such an important fact, yet one has ever seen it even so much as worthy of comment.
Additionally, with respect to all the IPR so called "wins". While they once had the power to help see the price spike to 45 cents, along with many paid and unpaid pumps, some of which I identified by name and amount paid, they simply were a LOSS for the entities that brought the IPR's. That's the proper way to look at it because vplm didn't gain or lose anything in the deal. In other words, the patents in question were valid from the start and remained valid til the end. There was nothing truly gained or lost. It was just a wash for vplm I guess you could say. But it was indeed a loss for those who tried to invalidate certain aspects of the patents. So to reiterate, the patents have been valid from the moment of birth up to the present. That affords them NO VALUE, NO EFFICACY, NO PROOF OF WORKABILITY, NO PROOF OF NEED.
VPLM has exactly the same thing, patent wise, as always, nothing more nothing less.
The fact of the matter is that many many many so called "valid" patents have later been found to be invalid.... but far more importantly, have never realized any value whatsoever. The reasons for that are various and sundry and no doubt sometimes could be attributed to a faulty or corrupt congress or in some cases the patents, though perfectly valid, are useless for a variety of possible reasons, such as out of date, incompatability, flaws, etc.
And it's a curious thing, how vaunted the ptab has been characterized here, when connecting to all the IPR "wins", curious when considering how before those wins, the ptab, it's leader, it's judges, were clearly found to be corrupt. That was all reported here with the cynicism appropriate to the facts, but oh so conveniently forgetten, lol, once ol Sawyer threatened them with federal RICO charges...... hahaha...... and then, and only then......lolol....they did their 180° and approved EVERYTHING for vplm in an unprecedented way.
This has been the clarion call from the gjtgo... Its so misunderstood by so many for so long, it's amazing, given that the truth of the matter has been explained, with facts over ignorance, so many times here...
1st of all, of course the patents are real, lolol.....they can't be anything but real. A real patent is born when an application gets approved by the uspto, based on a short list of criteria the application must meet. I have reported many times that such patent criteria and approval does NOT in any way, shape or form, imply, suggest, prove or validate that the patent includes EFFICACY, VALUE or WORKABILITY... That is such an important fact, yet one has ever seen it even so much as worthy of comment.
Additionally, with respect to all the IPR so called "wins". While they once had the power to help see the price spike to 45 cents, along with many paid and unpaid pumps, some of which I identified by name and amount paid, they simply were a LOSS for the entities that brought the IPR's. That's the proper way to look at it because vplm didn't gain or lose anything in the deal. In other words, the patents in question were valid from the start and remained valid til the end. There was nothing truly gained or lost. It was just a wash for vplm I guess you could say. But it was indeed a loss for those who tried to invalidate certain aspects of the patents. So to reiterate, the patents have been valid from the moment of birth up to the present. That affords them NO VALUE, NO EFFICACY, NO PROOF OF WORKABILITY, NO PROOF OF NEED.
VPLM has exactly the same thing, patent wise, as always, nothing more nothing less.
The fact of the matter is that many many many so called "valid" patents have later been found to be invalid.... but far more importantly, have never realized any value whatsoever. The reasons for that are various and sundry and no doubt sometimes could be attributed to a faulty or corrupt congress or in some cases the patents, though perfectly valid, are useless for a variety of possible reasons, such as out of date, incompatability, flaws, etc.
And it's a curious thing, how vaunted the ptab has been characterized here, when connecting to all the IPR "wins", curious when considering how before those wins, the ptab, it's leader, it's judges, were clearly found to be corrupt. That was all reported here with the cynicism appropriate to the facts, but oh so conveniently forgetten, lol, once ol Sawyer threatened them with federal RICO charges...... hahaha...... and then, and only then......lolol....they did their 180° and approved EVERYTHING for vplm in an unprecedented way.
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
Recent VPLM News
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 07:31:49 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/23/2026 05:07:30 PM
- VoIP-Pal Files Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions in Federal Antitrust and RICO Litigation • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/18/2026 04:14:27 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/16/2026 07:46:40 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/11/2026 11:18:22 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/17/2026 09:58:13 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/12/2026 10:21:42 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/06/2026 08:54:15 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2026 10:17:43 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2026 09:44:11 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/05/2026 08:08:28 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/24/2025 01:13:41 AM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/23/2025 10:16:49 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/02/2025 09:11:21 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/29/2025 06:17:43 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/29/2025 05:53:57 PM
- Form 4/A - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/25/2025 09:50:14 PM
- VoIP-Pal Has Filed and Served Amended Antitrust Complaints Against Apple, Google, and Samsung • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/24/2025 12:00:00 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/17/2025 03:37:01 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 11:32:25 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 11:13:11 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 10:08:35 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/16/2025 04:16:38 PM
