Some posts you should be linked with B4. Others you finally after defending him
for so long you shouldn't be. His spamming of "those dems" you do not do.
My asking for a link with those words which were not originally yours is simply consistent with the board rule. You
know that. It doesn't matter how many times the link has been used. The rule applies to each individual post.
Plus to that, to include the link in each post as the rule asks would also clearly be considerate gesture toward the reader.
To your: "What I would like to see from you and those that follow "that issue" (distribution, where the wealth has been situated, etc,.. )
Closely; is a more detailed account well beyond Reganomics that illustrates the players, changes and importantly those aspects
That need to be reversed or altered to CORRECT THE PROBLEM.
OTHERWISE IT CONTINUES.
And, the board will continue to talk shiny objects - symptoms of the problem UNCORRECTED."
Any form of your 'what you would like to see' as you state there would be available to you on the net somewhere. That work is not what this board is about. This board is not going to change the world to something other than what it is. Your request is both unjustified and unreasonable.
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”