AI
Friday, February 24, 2023 11:11:09 PM
Has Fight Club Aged Poorly?
"From Gingrich to McCarthy, the Roots of Governance by Chaos
Mr. Gingrich began the zero-sum politics that mutated into the brand of the Tea Party and Trump M.A.G.A. Republicans and that presaged the raucous speaker battle in the House.
[...]
In contrast, Mr. Gingrich said of his own speakership, which sought a revolt in the Republican Party and the way Washington does business, “We weren’t just grandstanders. We were purposeful.” He would be glad to show the current rebels how to do it, he said. “But anything that takes longer than waiting for their cappuccino, I doubt they’re interested in.”
P - History does not precisely remember it that way. It is true that Mr. Gingrich’s tenure from 1995 through 1998 produced several legislative accomplishments, including two balanced budgets signed into law by a Democratic president, Bill Clinton. But to both Democrats and Republicans, the jut-jawed intransigence of House Republicans opposing Representative Kevin McCarthy’s ultimately successful bid to be speaker did not materialize out of nowhere.
P - Instead, Mr. Gingrich’s triumph in 1994 in wresting the House from a Democratic majority for the first time since 1952 was the starting point for the zero-sum brand of politics that mutated into the Tea Party movement, the grievance-based populism of the Trump era, and what was garishly displayed on the House floor in a raucous four-day speaker battle that ended in the small hours of Saturday.
P - Those mutations have culminated in a tissue-thin Republican majority, auguring legislative episodes likely long on melodrama and short on happy endings, thanks to cameo actors such as Mr. Gaetz who have already demonstrated their zeal to seize the spotlight from the new speaker. Such actors appear to interpret their roles as opposing anything that the Biden administration might support, including sending military aid to Ukraine and avoiding a default on government obligations by raising the federal debt ceiling.
[...]
Though Mr. Gingrich and his two lieutenants, Dick Armey, the House majority leader, and Tom DeLay, the majority whip, preached ruthless partisanship, in the end, Mr. Gingrich was forced out of power by his fellow Republicans in 1998 after agreeing to a budget deal with Mr. Clinton. The party lost the House majority in 2006, “though frankly, even before then, the Gingrich faction did not feel that they had won when George W. Bush won, because they weren’t interested in his ‘compassionate conservatism,’” Mr. Hoyer recalled.
P - The election of Barack Obama in 2008 thrust Mr. Gingrich back into relevancy."
Related: The "Republican Revolution", "Revolution of '94", or "Gingrich Revolution" are political slogans that refer to the Republican Party (GOP) success in the 1994 U.S. mid-term elections,[1] which resulted in a net gain of 54 seats in the House of Representatives, and a pick-up of eight seats in the Senate. On November 9, 1994, the day after the election, Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, a conservative Democrat, changed parties, becoming a Republican; on March 3, 1995, Colorado Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell switched to the Republican side as well, increasing the GOP Senate majority.[2]
[...]
The gains in seats in the mid-term election resulted in the Republicans gaining control of both the House and the Senate in January 1995. Republicans had not held the majority in the House for 40 years, since the 83rd Congress (elected in 1952). From 1933 to 1995, Republicans had controlled both House and Senate for only four years. From 1933 into the early 1970s, most white conservatives in the South belonged to the Democratic Party, and created the Solid South bloc in Congress. Most African Americans in the South were disenfranchised in those years, based on laws and subjective administration of voter registration practices.
P - By the mid-1990s, white conservatives from the South joined Republicans in other parts of the country, leading to the change in Congress. Large Republican gains were made in state houses as well when the GOP picked up twelve gubernatorial seats and 472 legislative seats. In so doing, it took control of 20 state legislatures from the Democrats. Prior to this, Republicans had not held the majority of governorships since 1972. In addition, this was the first time in 50 years that the GOP controlled a majority of state legislatures.
[...]
The 1994 election also marked the end of the conservative coalition, a bi-partisan coalition of conservative Republicans and Democrats (often referred to as "boll weevil Democrats", for their association with the South). This white conservative coalition had often managed to control Congressional outcomes since the New Deal era.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Revolution
By Neeraj Chand
Published Jan 2, 2023
Recently accused of sexism, does the controversial movie Fight Club still hold up as groundbreaking cinema in the modern age?
20th Century Studios
There is a general feeling among movie critics and cinephiles that modern cinema has become too watered down and mild in an effort to appeal to the broadest audiences possible and not offend anyone. In the past, Hollywood studios were much more willing to make mainstream movies that risked provoking outrage from the public. One movie that did so in spades was 1999's Fight Club .. https://movieweb.com/movie/fight-club/ .. starring Brad Pitt, Edward Norton, and Helena Bonham Carter.
Helmed with an uncompromising clarity of vision by director David Fincher, Fight Club was a violent, profane, bleakly satirical take on '90s consumer culture and the disenfranchised generation of middle America entering into adulthood at the time. The movie caused a sensation upon release for all the wrong reasons , even getting heavily censored .. https://movieweb.com/fight-club-chinese-censored-ending/ .. in some places for its incendiary content. Yet over time Fight Club has gathered a passionate global following and is today regarded as a cult classic masterpiece. Let's take a look at whether the themes and ideas of Fight Club .. https://movieweb.com/what-is-the-actual-point-of-fight-club/ .. hold up more than two decades later.
Video - https://movieweb.com/fight-club-aged-sexist-controversial/
Rage Against the Machine
20th Century Studios
The reason Fight Club got so much negative press upon release was that its main storyline seemed to be teaching all the wrong lessons to audiences. The movie follows an unnamed protagonist who works as an automobile recall specialist. Deeply unhappy with his unfulfilling life despite having plenty of money and a nice apartment filled with every modern convenience, the protagonist suffers from insomnia and a general feeling of emptiness in his life.
He finally finds a purpose after meeting the intensely charismatic Tyler Durden. Together, Tyler and the protagonist start a club where similarly lost and aimless men can beat the stuffing out of each other to feel alive in the moment. Soon the club devolves into something more dangerous, as Tyler secretly plots to destroy multiple buildings using homemade bombs in a misguided revolutionary act to level the playing field .. http://movieweb.com/best-movie-revolutions/ .. between the rich and poor of society.
Is Fight Club Sexist or a Deconstruction of Toxic Masculinity?
20th Century Studios
Many if not all of the main male characters of Fight Club exhibit traits of toxic masculinity towards each other and the rest of society. The members of Fight Club view violence as a way to find meaning and respect in life. They worship Tyler as the alpha male of the pack, and are willing to become domestic terrorists after being brainwashed into joining his cause at the expense of their own personal identities.
Tyler himself is a charming but sociopathic antihero .. https://movieweb.com/antiheroes-breaking-bad/ . He treats the movie's female lead Marla with little consideration beyond sleeping with her. Tyler also looks down on others weaker than him with disdain and has no problem with committing whole-scale destruction out of a twisted philosophy that values ideas over people, even his own followers. Many of Tyler's ideas and quotes from the movie and the book it was based on have been co-opted by modern internet groups .. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jul/20/chuck-palahniuk-interview-adjustment-day-black-ethno-state-gay-parenting-incel-movement .. that celebrate toxic masculinity.
Disturbing and Controversial Scenes in Fight Club
-1.jpg?q=50&fit=crop&w=1500&dpr=1.5)
20th Century Studios
Apart from its main theme of alienation and violence, Fight Club contains many visual moments that would come with a trigger warning in modern times. Like the scene where the unnamed protagonist loses himself in a mental haze during a Fight Club meeting and brutally keeps punching a fellow member well past the point where the latter has lost the fight and is lying bloodied and inert on the ground.
RELATED:
Here Are Some of the Most Intense Scenes in Movie History
https://movieweb.com/intense-movie-scenes/
There is also the copious amounts of profanity that every main character spews generously and frequently. Tyler himself is responsible for many of the movie's worst scenes, like relieving himself into a bowl of soup that is waiting to be ordered at a fancy restaurant, or the running gag of a male genitalia popping up on screen for a few seconds.
Is Fight Club Too Much for Modern Audiences?
Warner Bros.
The previously mentioned facts are the main reasons why Fight Club caused so much controversy when the film was first released .. https://movieweb.com/controversial-movies/ . But with the passage of a few years, audiences were able to appreciate that the movie was not a worshipful ode to male-on-male violence, but rather it had something important and relevant to say about the state of the disenfranchised in society.
RELATED:
Here are Some Philosophical Movies and Why They're Brilliant
https://movieweb.com/philosophical-movies/
In this aspect, Fight Club shares a startling similarity with 2019's Joker. Just like Fight Club, Joker was initially lambasted by critics for focusing on "white male rage .. https://www.salon.com/2020/02/08/joker-oscars-white-male-rage-win/ ." But after the film was released audiences saw that its story was not about celebrating violence and anger, but talking about the poor and mentally ill members of society who feel abandoned by the world and resort to desperate measures to feel alive and valued.
Fight Club Is Still Culturally Relevant
20th Century Studios
In the hands of lesser talent, Fight Club could have easily been a schlocky, cheaply provocative gore-fest with nothing important to say. But the world created by David Fincher and ably populated by a talented cast led by Brad Pitt and Edward Norton goes much deeper than that. Sure, Fight Club contains many shocking and disturbing moments, but they are always in service of a larger point the movie wants to make about the dangers of violence and a self-centered worldview.
In that sense Fight Club is a much more responsible action movie than so many modern blockbusters where the act of shooting or killing innumerable henchmen is treated as something the hero does all the time just to look cool and badass. It's okay to not like Fight Club's message, or how it chooses to convey that message, but there is no denying the impact the movie has had on generations of fans trying to search for meaning in their own lives.
https://movieweb.com/fight-club-aged-sexist-controversial/
See also:
WHY?? Because - Exposé Sinister past of millionaire Chechen strongman Ramzan Kadyrov who is Putin's pal
[...]
"We don't have those kind of people here. We don't have any gays. If there are any, take them to Canada.”
P - Praise be to God. Take them far from us so we don't have them at home. To purify our blood, if there are any here, take them."
[...]
Celebrity athletes such as Floyd Mayweather, Tyson Fury and Khabib Nurmagomedov have all been paid to attend events organised by his fight club.
P - In 2016 he hosted an MMA fight, featuring three of his sons, aged 11, 9 and 8 to celebrate his 40th birthday.
P - It was broadcast on a MMA station in Russia which was condemned by Russian fighter Fedor Emelianenko. He branded the move as “inexcusable” as children under-12 are banned from competing in, or even attending, MMA fights.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168375004
Let's start with Bannon being a dishonest, power-hungry far-right wing prick,...
[...]
We searched for other instances in which Bannon referred to himself as a Leninist and came up empty-handed. However, we did find multiple instances of Bannon’s espousing anti-establishment ideals (although there was no other instance of him saying that he wanted to “destroy the state”).
P - In January 2016, for instance, Bannon was quoted by the Washington Post‘s referring to him as “virulently anti-establishment”:
P - “We call ourselves ‘the Fight Club.’ You don’t come to us for warm and fuzzy,” said Stephen Bannon, Breitbart’s executive chairman and one of its guiding editorial spirits. He adds, “We think of ourselves as virulently anti-establishment, particularly ‘anti-’ the permanent political class. We say Paul Ryan was grown in a petri dish at the Heritage Foundation.”
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169481447
Zero Hedge is a popular batshit insane finance blog run by an anonymous founder who posts articles under the name "Tyler Durden," after Chuck Palahniuk's Fight Club antagonist personality.
[...]
The only writer very conclusively identified is Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=85563190
"From Gingrich to McCarthy, the Roots of Governance by Chaos
Mr. Gingrich began the zero-sum politics that mutated into the brand of the Tea Party and Trump M.A.G.A. Republicans and that presaged the raucous speaker battle in the House.
[...]
In contrast, Mr. Gingrich said of his own speakership, which sought a revolt in the Republican Party and the way Washington does business, “We weren’t just grandstanders. We were purposeful.” He would be glad to show the current rebels how to do it, he said. “But anything that takes longer than waiting for their cappuccino, I doubt they’re interested in.”
P - History does not precisely remember it that way. It is true that Mr. Gingrich’s tenure from 1995 through 1998 produced several legislative accomplishments, including two balanced budgets signed into law by a Democratic president, Bill Clinton. But to both Democrats and Republicans, the jut-jawed intransigence of House Republicans opposing Representative Kevin McCarthy’s ultimately successful bid to be speaker did not materialize out of nowhere.
P - Instead, Mr. Gingrich’s triumph in 1994 in wresting the House from a Democratic majority for the first time since 1952 was the starting point for the zero-sum brand of politics that mutated into the Tea Party movement, the grievance-based populism of the Trump era, and what was garishly displayed on the House floor in a raucous four-day speaker battle that ended in the small hours of Saturday.
P - Those mutations have culminated in a tissue-thin Republican majority, auguring legislative episodes likely long on melodrama and short on happy endings, thanks to cameo actors such as Mr. Gaetz who have already demonstrated their zeal to seize the spotlight from the new speaker. Such actors appear to interpret their roles as opposing anything that the Biden administration might support, including sending military aid to Ukraine and avoiding a default on government obligations by raising the federal debt ceiling.
[...]
Though Mr. Gingrich and his two lieutenants, Dick Armey, the House majority leader, and Tom DeLay, the majority whip, preached ruthless partisanship, in the end, Mr. Gingrich was forced out of power by his fellow Republicans in 1998 after agreeing to a budget deal with Mr. Clinton. The party lost the House majority in 2006, “though frankly, even before then, the Gingrich faction did not feel that they had won when George W. Bush won, because they weren’t interested in his ‘compassionate conservatism,’” Mr. Hoyer recalled.
P - The election of Barack Obama in 2008 thrust Mr. Gingrich back into relevancy."
Related: The "Republican Revolution", "Revolution of '94", or "Gingrich Revolution" are political slogans that refer to the Republican Party (GOP) success in the 1994 U.S. mid-term elections,[1] which resulted in a net gain of 54 seats in the House of Representatives, and a pick-up of eight seats in the Senate. On November 9, 1994, the day after the election, Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama, a conservative Democrat, changed parties, becoming a Republican; on March 3, 1995, Colorado Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell switched to the Republican side as well, increasing the GOP Senate majority.[2]
[...]
The gains in seats in the mid-term election resulted in the Republicans gaining control of both the House and the Senate in January 1995. Republicans had not held the majority in the House for 40 years, since the 83rd Congress (elected in 1952). From 1933 to 1995, Republicans had controlled both House and Senate for only four years. From 1933 into the early 1970s, most white conservatives in the South belonged to the Democratic Party, and created the Solid South bloc in Congress. Most African Americans in the South were disenfranchised in those years, based on laws and subjective administration of voter registration practices.
P - By the mid-1990s, white conservatives from the South joined Republicans in other parts of the country, leading to the change in Congress. Large Republican gains were made in state houses as well when the GOP picked up twelve gubernatorial seats and 472 legislative seats. In so doing, it took control of 20 state legislatures from the Democrats. Prior to this, Republicans had not held the majority of governorships since 1972. In addition, this was the first time in 50 years that the GOP controlled a majority of state legislatures.
[...]
The 1994 election also marked the end of the conservative coalition, a bi-partisan coalition of conservative Republicans and Democrats (often referred to as "boll weevil Democrats", for their association with the South). This white conservative coalition had often managed to control Congressional outcomes since the New Deal era.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Revolution
By Neeraj Chand
Published Jan 2, 2023
Recently accused of sexism, does the controversial movie Fight Club still hold up as groundbreaking cinema in the modern age?
20th Century Studios
There is a general feeling among movie critics and cinephiles that modern cinema has become too watered down and mild in an effort to appeal to the broadest audiences possible and not offend anyone. In the past, Hollywood studios were much more willing to make mainstream movies that risked provoking outrage from the public. One movie that did so in spades was 1999's Fight Club .. https://movieweb.com/movie/fight-club/ .. starring Brad Pitt, Edward Norton, and Helena Bonham Carter.
Helmed with an uncompromising clarity of vision by director David Fincher, Fight Club was a violent, profane, bleakly satirical take on '90s consumer culture and the disenfranchised generation of middle America entering into adulthood at the time. The movie caused a sensation upon release for all the wrong reasons , even getting heavily censored .. https://movieweb.com/fight-club-chinese-censored-ending/ .. in some places for its incendiary content. Yet over time Fight Club has gathered a passionate global following and is today regarded as a cult classic masterpiece. Let's take a look at whether the themes and ideas of Fight Club .. https://movieweb.com/what-is-the-actual-point-of-fight-club/ .. hold up more than two decades later.
Video - https://movieweb.com/fight-club-aged-sexist-controversial/
Rage Against the Machine
20th Century Studios
The reason Fight Club got so much negative press upon release was that its main storyline seemed to be teaching all the wrong lessons to audiences. The movie follows an unnamed protagonist who works as an automobile recall specialist. Deeply unhappy with his unfulfilling life despite having plenty of money and a nice apartment filled with every modern convenience, the protagonist suffers from insomnia and a general feeling of emptiness in his life.
He finally finds a purpose after meeting the intensely charismatic Tyler Durden. Together, Tyler and the protagonist start a club where similarly lost and aimless men can beat the stuffing out of each other to feel alive in the moment. Soon the club devolves into something more dangerous, as Tyler secretly plots to destroy multiple buildings using homemade bombs in a misguided revolutionary act to level the playing field .. http://movieweb.com/best-movie-revolutions/ .. between the rich and poor of society.
Is Fight Club Sexist or a Deconstruction of Toxic Masculinity?
20th Century Studios
Many if not all of the main male characters of Fight Club exhibit traits of toxic masculinity towards each other and the rest of society. The members of Fight Club view violence as a way to find meaning and respect in life. They worship Tyler as the alpha male of the pack, and are willing to become domestic terrorists after being brainwashed into joining his cause at the expense of their own personal identities.
Tyler himself is a charming but sociopathic antihero .. https://movieweb.com/antiheroes-breaking-bad/ . He treats the movie's female lead Marla with little consideration beyond sleeping with her. Tyler also looks down on others weaker than him with disdain and has no problem with committing whole-scale destruction out of a twisted philosophy that values ideas over people, even his own followers. Many of Tyler's ideas and quotes from the movie and the book it was based on have been co-opted by modern internet groups .. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jul/20/chuck-palahniuk-interview-adjustment-day-black-ethno-state-gay-parenting-incel-movement .. that celebrate toxic masculinity.
Disturbing and Controversial Scenes in Fight Club
-1.jpg?q=50&fit=crop&w=1500&dpr=1.5)
20th Century Studios
Apart from its main theme of alienation and violence, Fight Club contains many visual moments that would come with a trigger warning in modern times. Like the scene where the unnamed protagonist loses himself in a mental haze during a Fight Club meeting and brutally keeps punching a fellow member well past the point where the latter has lost the fight and is lying bloodied and inert on the ground.
RELATED:
Here Are Some of the Most Intense Scenes in Movie History
https://movieweb.com/intense-movie-scenes/
There is also the copious amounts of profanity that every main character spews generously and frequently. Tyler himself is responsible for many of the movie's worst scenes, like relieving himself into a bowl of soup that is waiting to be ordered at a fancy restaurant, or the running gag of a male genitalia popping up on screen for a few seconds.
Is Fight Club Too Much for Modern Audiences?
Warner Bros.
The previously mentioned facts are the main reasons why Fight Club caused so much controversy when the film was first released .. https://movieweb.com/controversial-movies/ . But with the passage of a few years, audiences were able to appreciate that the movie was not a worshipful ode to male-on-male violence, but rather it had something important and relevant to say about the state of the disenfranchised in society.
RELATED:
Here are Some Philosophical Movies and Why They're Brilliant
https://movieweb.com/philosophical-movies/
In this aspect, Fight Club shares a startling similarity with 2019's Joker. Just like Fight Club, Joker was initially lambasted by critics for focusing on "white male rage .. https://www.salon.com/2020/02/08/joker-oscars-white-male-rage-win/ ." But after the film was released audiences saw that its story was not about celebrating violence and anger, but talking about the poor and mentally ill members of society who feel abandoned by the world and resort to desperate measures to feel alive and valued.
Fight Club Is Still Culturally Relevant
20th Century Studios
In the hands of lesser talent, Fight Club could have easily been a schlocky, cheaply provocative gore-fest with nothing important to say. But the world created by David Fincher and ably populated by a talented cast led by Brad Pitt and Edward Norton goes much deeper than that. Sure, Fight Club contains many shocking and disturbing moments, but they are always in service of a larger point the movie wants to make about the dangers of violence and a self-centered worldview.
In that sense Fight Club is a much more responsible action movie than so many modern blockbusters where the act of shooting or killing innumerable henchmen is treated as something the hero does all the time just to look cool and badass. It's okay to not like Fight Club's message, or how it chooses to convey that message, but there is no denying the impact the movie has had on generations of fans trying to search for meaning in their own lives.
https://movieweb.com/fight-club-aged-sexist-controversial/
See also:
WHY?? Because - Exposé Sinister past of millionaire Chechen strongman Ramzan Kadyrov who is Putin's pal
[...]
"We don't have those kind of people here. We don't have any gays. If there are any, take them to Canada.”
P - Praise be to God. Take them far from us so we don't have them at home. To purify our blood, if there are any here, take them."
[...]
Celebrity athletes such as Floyd Mayweather, Tyson Fury and Khabib Nurmagomedov have all been paid to attend events organised by his fight club.
P - In 2016 he hosted an MMA fight, featuring three of his sons, aged 11, 9 and 8 to celebrate his 40th birthday.
P - It was broadcast on a MMA station in Russia which was condemned by Russian fighter Fedor Emelianenko. He branded the move as “inexcusable” as children under-12 are banned from competing in, or even attending, MMA fights.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168375004
Let's start with Bannon being a dishonest, power-hungry far-right wing prick,...
[...]
We searched for other instances in which Bannon referred to himself as a Leninist and came up empty-handed. However, we did find multiple instances of Bannon’s espousing anti-establishment ideals (although there was no other instance of him saying that he wanted to “destroy the state”).
P - In January 2016, for instance, Bannon was quoted by the Washington Post‘s referring to him as “virulently anti-establishment”:
P - “We call ourselves ‘the Fight Club.’ You don’t come to us for warm and fuzzy,” said Stephen Bannon, Breitbart’s executive chairman and one of its guiding editorial spirits. He adds, “We think of ourselves as virulently anti-establishment, particularly ‘anti-’ the permanent political class. We say Paul Ryan was grown in a petri dish at the Heritage Foundation.”
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169481447
Zero Hedge is a popular batshit insane finance blog run by an anonymous founder who posts articles under the name "Tyler Durden," after Chuck Palahniuk's Fight Club antagonist personality.
[...]
The only writer very conclusively identified is Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=85563190
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”
Discover What Traders Are Watching
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
