Ubiquitech Software Corp (UBQU)

[80 bluchip 20 pot]

yes, I've explained an R/S I also do not think is in the future, but I also think an R/S would help us the retailers more than the present stagnation and it isn't Ballas withholding "good" things from us, but the OTC denying such things which would benefit the share price and us retail investors.

the metaverse play is similar to the cryptolie craze of 2017...yeah turned out to be a bad bet, but remember, many more than ballas, like...the lame stream media was all Facebook facebook facebook! the metaverse is dead (for now) and so is the FANG stock craze. luckily, those ads probably only cost UBQU thousands of dollars. and who knows? it takes most new technologies one to 4 years to go from a joke to the greatest thing.

I don't defend ballas as some genius, he continues to make moves that honestly, are dumping on thousands of ceos.

yes he's a ceo of a number of companies. that could be as simple as his old wild west buddies died and the ceo-ship was handed to him, or there are other companies with real humans on their boards like IMTL who see opportunities we don't (these opportunities might be being BLOCKED by KENNY (not james) as I hypothesize but perhaps those insiders might bring more money and legal power to the eventual showdown that is going to maybe make moves on the openly exposed daily corruption of wall street and the SEC.

also there's very little risk to UBQU baggies when Ballas becomes CEo of a spinoff. like GDET, ballas didn't do jack. off it went to expert.my guess is he probably TRIED to merge it with UBQU and it was denied. oh well I doubt anybody reading our back and forth had any bags in GDET. I had a tiny one, and I dumped it the day of declaring expert before it went to nobid with no disclosure.
XREG not sure ballas was ceo, he was on the board, but again, it went expert, and I wasn't in it. my guess ballas as a board member was just a think they all did back before we learned that the OTC was sure, the wild wild west, but the major indices were crime ridden gotham! regardless, no skin off Ballas' nose.

Global links? that one now in hindsight is FASCINATING. you see we had someone showing e-mails and TWEETS from a James. A. Ballas (that name) pumping global links and claiming global links was the owner of Hemp life dated 2013.
global links pumped, then it dumped.
looking forward, with the twitter GINORMOUS SCANDALS and how easy it is to fake a date in an ihub post? I think that twitter wasn't James A. Ballas at all, and I don't trust that article either. it all went away when UBQU was proven to be the owner of cannazall etc, so that fear stopped pinballing about.
as for CBD products selling above 50 dollars a piece? unsure how that is a criticism of cannazall. the pricing on cannazall CBD seems valid to me. and the entire industry, I'm unsure of any of them doing well. the one that got lucky enough to hit kroeger shelves well it pumped their stock in 2018 when it happened but they came back down super hard in potaggedon of 2019 and when I hear reports on it, it is about how flavorless and uninspired the kroeger pushed CBD product is.

your final argument about Lawrence replacing ballas as ceo of image protect is backward. lawrence died. ballas was made ceo. how that happened unsure

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/image-protect-inc-provides-corporate-160000580.html

but here's the link. august 3 2022, passing of former ceo, on yahoo finance which is a water carrier for wall street imo. so I tend to trust it when they presented which is honestly an anodyne article.

I might have wrote that last one about merger, but it doesn't 100% seem my tone. maybe yours? even so, I tend to AGREE with that last post especially since ballas is now ceo of IMTL

but of course we are rehashing the same back and forth for no reason imo.
I've explained for the folks who actually read me (they tell me in PM they do and thank me for my posts)

- I think there are (and were) plans for various things which makes sense like a symbol and CUSIP change for UBQU to cannazall, the rationale being C-Z products really doesn't need "Ubiquitous software" as their monicker, it's outdated
- however, my theory states a CUSIP change in ANY way, through merger or symbol change would recall all the shares. In my opinion, with the 8B mystery game which happened last time movie stock shot up, there's a real good chance a CUSIP change would not be a happy day for wall street and market makers.
- therefore, it makes sense that NONE of these things have happened, and of course, since we won't be allowed to see if there were shenanigans until "judgement day" for wall street...it is very easy to blame the CEO.

anyhoo, and so the game continues. retailers who are bagholding stock can at least get some emotional salve blaming the CEO on ANY stock.
but other than that, if one bet what they could afford, and keep emotions out of it and follow the PRs both true and fabricated, perhaps we'll find ourselves in the sky one day.