Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Thanks again Clarence! In Collins, given the crystal clear precedent in Seila Law, I think the Supremes were focused on the reasoning the insulated FHFA Director is like the CFPB Director.

As I'm sure you're aware, during orals in Collins, some of the Justices mentioned the idea of Nationalization. Whether or not that was a head fake to get Moopar (the government attorney) to "dig deep" and give us your best arguments or sincere remains a mystery since the Takings Case denial centered on this "right to exclude others" bundle of rights that doesn't exist for federally chartered banks and the GSES under HERA.

One way to find out for sure though, would be to initiate a lawsuit in the federal court.

Thanks again for your time and contributions and enlightenment on the Nondelegation Doctrine!